Li-Ling Chen

26 papers receiving 268 citations

Peers

Li-Ling Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 28
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 11
  • Computer Science Applications 17
  • Research and Theory 2
  • Education 62
Replace Katharina Schuster with:
Katharina Schuster Germany
M.W. Duffrin United States
Luisa Panichi Italy
Siobhán O’Sullivan United Arab Emirates
Megan Barker Canada
G. Rodríguez Spain
Sandra L. Williams United States
Lydia R. Galagovsky Argentina
Javier Moreno Tapia Mexico
Debbie Clayton United Kingdom
Li-Ling Chen relative to Katharina Schuster Germany Katharina Schuster's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Katharina Schuster · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Li-Ling Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Li-Ling Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Li-Ling Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Li-Ling Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Li-Ling Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Li-Ling Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Li-Ling Chen. The network helps show where Li-Ling Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Li-Ling Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Li-Ling Chen Line = papers co-authored together Li-Ling Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201845
2 201641
3 201935
4 202122
5 202121
6 202120
7 20209
8 19949
9 20158
10 20208
11 20147
12
Efficient computation of fixpoints that arise in complex program analysis.
19956
13 20236
14 20176
15 20196
16
Integrating iPad in a Special Education Class: A Case study
20125
17
Enhancing Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Students’ Learning with a Learning Management System (LMS)
20085
18 20215
19 20115
20 20193

About Li-Ling Chen

Li-Ling Chen is a scholar working on Education, Information Systems, Plant Science, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 29 papers that have together received 285 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Online and Blended Learning (4 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (4 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (2 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers), Wine Industry and Tourism (2 papers) and Lymphatic System and Diseases (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (28 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (11 citations), Computer Science Applications (17 citations), Research and Theory (2 citations) and Education (62 citations). Li-Ling Chen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Huihui Zhao, Yanni Wu, Chin‐Feng Hwang, Chunlan Zhou, Lance Cadle‐Davidson, Xiaojin Li, Katie E. Hyma, Chunlan Zhou, S Samuel Yang and Xiaoxia Li. Their work appears in journals such as Nutrients, Theoretical and Applied Genetics, Cancer Nursing, BMC Psychiatry and Phytopathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact