Luisa Panichi

559 citations
13 papers · 332 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Luisa Panichi

13 papers receiving 281 citations

Peers

Luisa Panichi
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Pharmaceutical Science 103
  • Human-Computer Interaction 56
  • Language and Linguistics 97
  • Molecular Medicine 23
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 57
Replace Edward C. Bell with:
Edward C. Bell United States
Azadeh Asgari Malaysia
Ayesha Batool Pakistan
Mortaza Yamini Iran
Robert J. Blake United States
Edmond Holohan Ireland
Marta Carretero Spain
Ali Sorayyaei Azar Malaysia
Normaliza Abd Rahim Malaysia
Silvia Canto Netherlands
Luisa Panichi relative to Edward C. Bell United States Edward C. Bell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16.2×
Edward C. Bell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Luisa Panichi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luisa Panichi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luisa Panichi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luisa Panichi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luisa Panichi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luisa Panichi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luisa Panichi. The network helps show where Luisa Panichi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Luisa Panichi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Luisa Panichi Line = papers co-authored together Luisa Panichi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 200999
2 199675
3 200048
4 200930
5 200026
6 201315
7 201812
8 20106
9 20106
10 20155
11
Virtual Worlds for Language Learning and Intercultural Exchange : Is it for real?
20105
12
Language learning in virtual worlds : Research issues and methods
20124
13
Virtual Learning, Real Heritage Benefits and Challenges of VirtualWorlds for the Learning of Indigenous Minority Languages
20101

About Luisa Panichi

Luisa Panichi is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory, Communication, Pharmaceutical Science and Speech and Hearing, having authored 13 papers that have together received 332 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (6 papers), Second Language Learning and Teaching (4 papers), Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (2 papers), Educational Tools and Methods (2 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers), Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (2 papers), Digital Storytelling and Education (2 papers) and Wikis in Education and Collaboration (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (103 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (56 citations), Language and Linguistics (97 citations), Molecular Medicine (23 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (57 citations). Luisa Panichi has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Sweden and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Mats Deutschmann, Judith Molka-Danielsen, Susi Burgalassi, M.F. Saettone, Patrizia Chetoni, Jette Bredahl Jacobsen, Margrethe Rømer Rassing, Enrico Boldrini, U Benelli and Ciara R. Wigham. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, ReCALL, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, Language Awareness and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact