Andrew L. Thomas

1.2k total citations
67 papers, 776 citations indexed

About

Andrew L. Thomas is a scholar working on Plant Science, Forestry and Biochemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew L. Thomas has authored 67 papers receiving a total of 776 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 33 papers in Plant Science, 12 papers in Forestry and 10 papers in Biochemistry. Recurrent topics in Andrew L. Thomas's work include Horticultural and Viticultural Research (15 papers), Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems (10 papers) and Berry genetics and cultivation research (9 papers). Andrew L. Thomas is often cited by papers focused on Horticultural and Viticultural Research (15 papers), Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems (10 papers) and Berry genetics and cultivation research (9 papers). Andrew L. Thomas collaborates with scholars based in United States, Brazil and China. Andrew L. Thomas's co-authors include David D. Pollard, C. Michael Greenlief, Patrick L. Byers, Chad E. Finn, Kiruba Krishnaswamy, Peggy J. Bledsoe, Joseph C. Polacco, T. C. Kaspar, David Bräuer and Mark R. Ellersieck and has published in prestigious journals such as PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Andrew L. Thomas

62 papers receiving 730 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Andrew L. Thomas United States 15 287 139 138 126 75 67 776
Tingting Tan China 11 287 1.0× 63 0.5× 185 1.3× 70 0.6× 9 0.1× 24 563
V. Balakrishnan India 13 448 1.6× 28 0.2× 128 0.9× 86 0.7× 29 0.4× 87 839
Hassan Boukcim France 15 403 1.4× 32 0.2× 77 0.6× 54 0.4× 11 0.1× 47 677
Jesús Val Falcón Spain 18 758 2.6× 53 0.4× 152 1.1× 95 0.8× 12 0.2× 87 1.0k
Zhu Zhu China 13 773 2.7× 78 0.6× 154 1.1× 76 0.6× 4 0.1× 29 1.1k
Luca Brillante United States 18 731 2.5× 56 0.4× 108 0.8× 445 3.5× 4 0.1× 33 923
Badal Kumar Datta India 15 309 1.1× 38 0.3× 148 1.1× 98 0.8× 47 0.6× 90 713
Hichem Hajlaoui Tunisia 14 653 2.3× 99 0.7× 125 0.9× 105 0.8× 10 0.1× 37 833
James W. Wallace United States 14 282 1.0× 52 0.4× 208 1.5× 40 0.3× 8 0.1× 47 718

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew L. Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew L. Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew L. Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew L. Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew L. Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew L. Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew L. Thomas. The network helps show where Andrew L. Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew L. Thomas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew L. Thomas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew L. Thomas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew L. Thomas. Andrew L. Thomas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Thomas, Andrew L., George E. Rottinghaus, Patrick L. Byers, et al.. (2024). Soil Nitrogen Fertility Influences the Growth and Yield of American Elderberry but Is Less Impactful than Genotype and Environment on Other Horticultural Characteristics. HortScience. 59(6). 787–793. 1 indexed citations
2.
Cai, Zhen, et al.. (2024). From Niche to Mainstream: US Consumer Trends and Preferences for Elderberry Products. HortScience. 59(12). 1723–1729.
3.
Perkins‐Veazie, Penelope, Mary Ann Lila, C. Michael Greenlief, et al.. (2023). Spray drying to produce novel phytochemical-rich ingredients from juice and pomace of American elderberry. Food Bioscience. 55. 102981–102981. 20 indexed citations
4.
Thomas, Andrew L., et al.. (2023). A comparative study of edible coatings and freshness paper on the quality of fresh North American pawpaw (Asimina triloba) fruits using TOPSIS-Shannon entropy analyses. Current Research in Food Science. 7. 100541–100541. 10 indexed citations
5.
Amorim, Helen C. S., Amanda J. Ashworth, Peter O’Brien, et al.. (2023). Temperate silvopastures provide greater ecosystem services than conventional pasture systems. Scientific Reports. 13(1). 18658–18658. 13 indexed citations
6.
Thomas, Andrew L., et al.. (2023). Performance of ‘Chambourcin’ Winegrape on 10 Different Root Systems in Southern Missouri, USA. HortTechnology. 33(3). 253–261. 1 indexed citations
7.
Thomas, Andrew L., et al.. (2023). ‘Pocahontas’: a vigorous and highly productive American elderberry. Acta Horticulturae. 59–68. 1 indexed citations
8.
Thomas, Andrew L., et al.. (2022). Quantification of Vitamins, Minerals, and Amino Acids in Black Walnut (Juglans nigra). Frontiers in Nutrition. 9. 936189–936189. 11 indexed citations
9.
Tran, Kevin, et al.. (2020). Annonacin and Squamocin Contents of Pawpaw (Asimina triloba) and Marolo (Annona crassiflora) Fruits and Atemoya (A. squamosa × A. cherimola) Seeds. Biological Trace Element Research. 199(6). 2320–2329. 5 indexed citations
10.
Lei, Zhentian, et al.. (2018). Metabolomics of Two Pecan Varieties Provides Insights into Scab Resistance. Metabolites. 8(4). 56–56. 10 indexed citations
11.
Warmund, Michele R., et al.. (2016). Sensory Attributes of Juice from North American–Grown Elderberry Cultivars. HortScience. 51(12). 1561–1565. 2 indexed citations
12.
Simonyi, Ágnes, Zihong Chen, Jinghua Jiang, et al.. (2015). Inhibition of microglial activation by elderberry extracts and its phenolic components. Life Sciences. 128. 30–38. 40 indexed citations
13.
Wu, Hanzhi, et al.. (2015). DETERMINATION OF ANTHOCYANINS AND TOTAL POLYPHENOLS IN A VARIETY OF ELDERBERRY JUICES BY UPLC-MS/MS AND OTHER METHODS. Acta Horticulturae. 1061(1061). 43–51. 21 indexed citations
14.
Chuang, Dennis Y., Wei Lei, Zhi‐Chun Gu, et al.. (2015). EFFECTS OF ELDERBERRY JUICE FROM DIFFERENT GENOTYPES ON OXIDATIVE AND INFLAMMATORY RESPONSES IN MICROGLIAL CELLS. Acta Horticulturae. 1061(1061). 281–288. 6 indexed citations
15.
Wu, Hanzhi, Chi‐Hua Lu, Kevin L. Fritsche, et al.. (2014). Peptidomics study of anthocyanin-rich juice of elderberry. Talanta. 131. 640–644. 2 indexed citations
16.
Thomas, Andrew L., Patrick L. Byers, & Mark R. Ellersieck. (2009). Productivity and Characteristics of American Elderberry in Response to Various Pruning Methods. HortScience. 44(3). 671–677. 9 indexed citations
17.
Finn, Chad E., Andrew L. Thomas, Patrick L. Byers, & Sedat Serçe. (2008). Evaluation of American (Sambucus canadensis) and European (S. nigra) Elderberry Genotypes Grown in Diverse Environments and Implications for Cultivar Development. HortScience. 43(5). 1385–1391. 30 indexed citations
18.
Thomas, Andrew L., George E. Rottinghaus, Wendy L. Applequist, et al.. (2007). Occurrence of 23-epi-26-deoxyactein and Cimiracemoside A in Various Black Cohosh Tissues Throughout the Growing Season. HortScience. 42(3). 535–539. 4 indexed citations
19.
Thomas, Andrew L., et al.. (2006). Effect of Planting Depth, Planting Season, and Fungicide Treatment on Establishment of Black Cohosh in a Poorly Drained Soil. HortScience. 41(2). 374–376. 10 indexed citations
20.
Thomas, Andrew L., et al.. (2004). A Kaolin-Based Particle Film Suppresses CertainInsect and Fungal Pests While Reducing Heat Stress inApples. Journal of American Pomological Society. 58(1). 42–51. 33 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026