Lidia Engel

2.2k citations
97 papers · 1.1k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Lidia Engel

88 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Lidia Engel
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Health 222
  • General Health Professions 419
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 220
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 21
  • Clinical Psychology 244
Replace Carl V. Hill with:
Carl V. Hill United States
Niels Kristian Rasmussen Denmark
Oanh L. Meyer United States
Esther M. Friedman United States
Kim Moesgaard Iburg Denmark
Gillian H. Ice United States
Lisa Graham‐Wisener United Kingdom
E. M. Andresen United States
Inna Feldman Sweden
Daniel Vicentini de Oliveira Brazil
Lidia Engel relative to Carl V. Hill United States Carl V. Hill's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Carl V. Hill · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lidia Engel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lidia Engel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lidia Engel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lidia Engel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lidia Engel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lidia Engel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lidia Engel. The network helps show where Lidia Engel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lidia Engel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lidia Engel Line = papers co-authored together Lidia Engel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 97 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2021119
2 201988
3 201659
4 202253
5 201529
6 201828
7 201426
8 201425
9 201722
10 202222
11 201921
12 202221
13 202021
14 201820
15 202020
16 201919
17 201818
18 202317
19 201717
20 201917

About Lidia Engel

Lidia Engel is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Health, Psychiatry and Mental health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 97 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (50 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (22 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (21 papers), Global Health Care Issues (19 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (11 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (11 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (9 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (222 citations), General Health Professions (419 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (220 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (21 citations) and Clinical Psychology (244 citations). Lidia Engel has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Cathrine Mihalopoulos, David G. T. Whitehurst, Jessica Bucholc, Long Khanh‐Dao Le, Stirling Bryan, Mary Lou Chatterton, Brendan Mulhern, Nikki McCaffrey, Michelle H. Lim and Julianne Holt‐Lunstad. Their work appears in journals such as Quality of Life Research, Value in Health, PharmacoEconomics, Patient and Health and Quality of Life Outcomes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact