Stacey Rand

1.4k total citations
60 papers, 711 citations indexed

About

Stacey Rand is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Stacey Rand has authored 60 papers receiving a total of 711 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 47 papers in General Health Professions, 26 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 18 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Stacey Rand's work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (41 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (25 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (18 papers). Stacey Rand is often cited by papers focused on Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (41 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (25 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (18 papers). Stacey Rand collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Austria and Australia. Stacey Rand's co-authors include Juliette Malley, Julien Forder, Ann Netten, Ann‐Marie Towers, Florin Vadean, James Caiels, Karen Jones, Nick Smith, Ray Fitzpatrick and Michele Peters and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Quality of Life Research and Age and Ageing.

In The Last Decade

Stacey Rand

56 papers receiving 692 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stacey Rand United Kingdom 17 489 276 216 165 124 60 711
Maureen Crane United Kingdom 16 813 1.7× 267 1.0× 54 0.3× 77 0.5× 75 0.6× 56 954
Leslie Foster United States 9 334 0.7× 113 0.4× 108 0.5× 53 0.3× 175 1.4× 15 549
Sue Tucker United Kingdom 14 404 0.8× 93 0.3× 40 0.2× 61 0.4× 109 0.9× 55 557
Michele Abendstern United Kingdom 14 415 0.8× 99 0.4× 30 0.1× 55 0.3× 142 1.1× 64 545
Alice de Boer Netherlands 11 296 0.6× 518 1.9× 22 0.1× 196 1.2× 67 0.5× 53 774
Cathy Thomson Australia 9 395 0.8× 367 1.3× 22 0.1× 58 0.4× 88 0.7× 24 670
Noreen Shugrue United States 9 298 0.6× 236 0.9× 26 0.1× 146 0.9× 21 0.2× 21 496
Diane Seddon United Kingdom 19 355 0.7× 312 1.1× 21 0.1× 56 0.3× 92 0.7× 50 679
Josephine M. Wildman United Kingdom 14 341 0.7× 45 0.2× 47 0.2× 112 0.7× 124 1.0× 32 686
Karen Windle United Kingdom 11 215 0.4× 43 0.2× 53 0.2× 86 0.5× 87 0.7× 52 398

Countries citing papers authored by Stacey Rand

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stacey Rand's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stacey Rand with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stacey Rand more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stacey Rand

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stacey Rand. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stacey Rand. The network helps show where Stacey Rand may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stacey Rand

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stacey Rand. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stacey Rand based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stacey Rand. Stacey Rand is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Davey, Vanessa, Jennifer Liddle, Bryony Beresford, et al.. (2025). Routine data collection in home care: a national survey of home care providers in England. Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent). 26(1). 56–69.
2.
Carroll, Rachael, Nick Smith, Jennifer Kirsty Burton, et al.. (2025). Piloting a minimum data set (MDS) in english care homes: a qualitative study of professional perspectives on implementation and data use. BMC Geriatrics. 25(1). 604–604.
3.
Allan, Stephen, Stacey Rand, Ann‐Marie Towers, et al.. (2025). Construct validity of measures of care home resident quality of life: cross-sectional analysis using data from a pilot minimum data set in England. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 23(1). 33–33. 2 indexed citations
5.
Rand, Stacey, et al.. (2023). Applying Outcomes in Community-Based Social Care Practice in England. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 33–44.
6.
Towers, Ann‐Marie, Adam Gordon, Arne Wolters, et al.. (2023). Piloting of a minimum data set for older people living in care homes in England: protocol for a longitudinal, mixed-methods study. BMJ Open. 13(2). e071686–e071686. 11 indexed citations
7.
Rand, Stacey, Ann‐Marie Towers, Juliette Malley, & Barbora Šilarova. (2023). Exploring the structural characteristics of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT) and ASCOT-Carer. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2. 21–21. 3 indexed citations
8.
Rand, Stacey, et al.. (2023). Developing a framework for reflection on policy-relevant care research using a study of older adults’ food and drink care-related needs. International Journal of Care and Caring. 8(1). 199–205. 1 indexed citations
10.
Kelly, Sarah, Andy Cowan, Gizdem Akdur, et al.. (2023). Outcome measures from international older adult care home intervention research: a scoping review. Age and Ageing. 52(5). 9 indexed citations
11.
Burton, Jennifer Kirsty, Arne Wolters, Ann‐Marie Towers, et al.. (2022). . Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity). 29 indexed citations
12.
Rand, Stacey, et al.. (2022). Applying a dyadic outcomes approach to supporting older carers and care‐recipients: A qualitative study of social care professionals in England. Health & Social Care in the Community. 30(6). e5001–e5009. 5 indexed citations
13.
Rand, Stacey, et al.. (2022). The quality of life of older carers and the people they support: An international scoping review. Health & Social Care in the Community. 30(6). e3342–e3353. 10 indexed citations
14.
Rand, Stacey, Ann‐Marie Towers, Juliette Malley, & Barbora Šilarova. (2022). Exploring the structural characteristics of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT) and ASCOT-Carer. NIHR Open Research. 2. 21–21. 3 indexed citations
15.
Rand, Stacey, et al.. (2021). Measuring safety in older adult care homes: a scoping review of the international literature. BMJ Open. 11(3). e043206–e043206. 8 indexed citations
16.
Rand, Stacey, Juliette Malley, Florin Vadean, & Julien Forder. (2019). Measuring the outcomes of long-term care for unpaid carers: comparing the ASCOT-Carer, Carer Experience Scale and EQ-5D-3 L. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 17(1). 184–184. 17 indexed citations
17.
Rand, Stacey, Juliette Malley, Ann‐Marie Towers, Ann Netten, & Julien Forder. (2017). Validity and test-retest reliability of the self-completion adult social care outcomes toolkit (ASCOT-SCT4) with adults with long-term physical, sensory and mental health conditions in England. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 15(1). 163–163. 35 indexed citations
18.
Rand, Stacey, et al.. (2017). Developing a proxy version of the Adult social care outcome toolkit (ASCOT). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 15(1). 108–108. 26 indexed citations
19.
Leeuwen, Karen M. van, Judith E. Bosmans, Stacey Rand, et al.. (2015). Dutch translation and cross-cultural validation of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 13(1). 56–56. 32 indexed citations
20.
Rand, Stacey, Juliette Malley, & Ann Netten. (2012). Measuring the social care outcomes of informal carers: an interim technical report for the Identifying the Impact of Social Care (IIASC) study. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026