Li‐Anne Liew

64 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Hit Papers

A microfabricated atomic clock20042026201120182004100200300400

Peers

Li‐Anne Liew
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.7k
  • Mechanical Engineering 502
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 466
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 409
  • Materials Chemistry 352
Replace Hao Tian with:
Hao Tian China
Tadahiro Ohmi Japan
Danièle Fournier France
Rudolf Weber Germany
Paul J. Wilbur United States
K. Niemi United Kingdom
W.A. Smith United States
Charles G. Askins United States
Geoff Dearden United Kingdom
Cristiano M. B. Cordeiro Brazil
Li‐Anne Liew relative to Hao Tian China Hao Tian's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×24.1×
Hao Tian · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Li‐Anne Liew

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Li‐Anne Liew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Li‐Anne Liew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Li‐Anne Liew more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Li‐Anne Liew

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Li‐Anne Liew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Li‐Anne Liew. The network helps show where Li‐Anne Liew may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Li‐Anne Liew

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Li‐Anne Liew. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Li‐Anne Liew based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Li‐Anne Liew. Li‐Anne Liew is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 2
2 5
3 5
4 5
5 11
6 6
7 1
8 65
9 70
10 1
11
A chip-scale atomic magnetometer with improved sensitivity using the Mx technique
8
12 1
13 9
14
Chip-Scale Atomic Frequency References: Fabrication and Performance
1
15
Chip-Scale Atomic Frequency References
7
16 280
17 7
18
Polymer-derived silicon carbonitride as a new technology for microelectromechanical systems
6
19 24
20 24

About Li‐Anne Liew

Li‐Anne Liew is a scholar working on Ceramics and Composites, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 67 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (25 papers), Quantum optics and atomic interactions (22 papers) and Advanced Frequency and Time Standards (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.7k citations), Ceramics and Composites (262 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (409 citations). Li‐Anne Liew has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Italy. Frequent co-authors include John Kitching, Svenja Knappe, John Moreland, Peter Schwindt, Vishal Shah, L. Hollberg, Victor M. Bright, Rishi Raj, Ronggui Yang and Martin L. Dunn. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Physics Letters, Acta Materialia and ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026