Geoff Dearden

3.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
139 papers, 2.9k citations indexed

About

Geoff Dearden is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Mechanics of Materials. According to data from OpenAlex, Geoff Dearden has authored 139 papers receiving a total of 2.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 102 papers in Computational Mechanics, 39 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 36 papers in Mechanics of Materials. Recurrent topics in Geoff Dearden's work include Laser Material Processing Techniques (86 papers), Laser and Thermal Forming Techniques (36 papers) and Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (30 papers). Geoff Dearden is often cited by papers focused on Laser Material Processing Techniques (86 papers), Laser and Thermal Forming Techniques (36 papers) and Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (30 papers). Geoff Dearden collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and Germany. Geoff Dearden's co-authors include Walter Perrie, Stuart Edwardson, K. G. Watkins, Dun Liu, M. Sharp, Jian Cheng, Zheng Kuang, Eamonn Fearon, N. G. Semaltianos and P. French and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Power Sources, Chemical Physics Letters and Optics Express.

In The Last Decade

Geoff Dearden

134 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Hit Papers

A review of ultrafast laser materials micromachining 2012 2026 2016 2021 2012 100 200 300

Peers

Geoff Dearden
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Computational Mechanics 1.5k
  • Biomedical Engineering 993
  • Mechanics of Materials 816
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 659
  • Mechanical Engineering 574
Replace K. G. Watkins with:
K. G. Watkins United Kingdom
S. Valette France
G.C. Lim Singapore
Stuart Edwardson United Kingdom
Jérôme Néauport France
F. von Alvensleben Germany
Jian Cheng China
Rudolf Weber Germany
Lana L. Wong United States
N. Arnold Austria
K. G. Watkins United Kingdom View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Geoff Dearden
Geoff Dearden · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Geoff Dearden
Geoff Dearden · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Geoff Dearden

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Geoff Dearden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Geoff Dearden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geoff Dearden more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Geoff Dearden

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Geoff Dearden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Geoff Dearden. The network helps show where Geoff Dearden may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Geoff Dearden

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Geoff Dearden. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Geoff Dearden based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Geoff Dearden. Geoff Dearden is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 1
3 0
4 3
5 5
6 3
7 8
8 24
9 68
10 3
11 70
12 1
13 1
14 15
15 78
16 2
17 1
18 15
19 1
20 2

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026