Leslie Rudy
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Gail S. GoodmanBette L. BottomsBeth M. Schwartz-KenneyJohn E. B. MyersGary B. MeltonDavid JonesChristine AmanKeith L. Kaufman
- Topics
- Child Abuse and Trauma (5 papers)Memory Processes and Influences (5 papers)Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Leslie Rudy
12 papers receiving 793 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Cognitive Neuroscience 453
- Clinical Psychology 446
- Social Psychology 320
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 238
- Sociology and Political Science 168
Countries citing papers authored by Leslie Rudy
This map shows the geographic impact of Leslie Rudy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leslie Rudy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leslie Rudy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Leslie Rudy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leslie Rudy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leslie Rudy. The network helps show where Leslie Rudy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Leslie Rudy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Leslie Rudy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Leslie Rudy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Leslie Rudy. Leslie Rudy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 36 | |
| 2 | Custody and expert opinion as factors in sexual abuse cases | 1 |
| 3 | 21 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 293 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | Interactions of sexually abused and nonabused children with anatomically correct dolls | 1 |
| 8 | 169 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 216 | |
| 11 | Children's concerns and memory: Issues of ecological validity in the study of children's eyewitness testimony. | 93 |
| 12 | 3 |
About Leslie Rudy
Leslie Rudy is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Gender Studies, having authored 12 papers that have together received 872 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Abuse and Trauma (5 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (5 papers) and Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (453 citations), Clinical Psychology (446 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (238 citations). Leslie Rudy has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Gail S. Goodman, Bette L. Bottoms, Beth M. Schwartz-Kenney, John E. B. Myers, Gary B. Melton, David Jones, Christine Aman, Keith L. Kaufman, Suzanne L. Davis and Cynthia Harbeck‐Weber. Their work appears in journals such as Developmental Psychology, Child Abuse & Neglect and Journal of Interpersonal Violence.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.