Leo Groarke
- Philosophy top 1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 2%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- David S BirdsellChristopher W. TindaleDavid GoddenCatherine Helen PalczewskiSarah TarlowDouglas P. LackeyJames O. YoungOliver Leaman
- Topics
- Classical Philosophy and Thought (7 papers)Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (7 papers)Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Leo Groarke
37 papers receiving 515 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Philosophy 237
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 170
- Literature and Literary Theory 148
- Artificial Intelligence 99
- Sociology and Political Science 79
Countries citing papers authored by Leo Groarke
This map shows the geographic impact of Leo Groarke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leo Groarke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leo Groarke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Leo Groarke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leo Groarke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leo Groarke. The network helps show where Leo Groarke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Leo Groarke
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Leo Groarke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Leo Groarke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Leo Groarke. Leo Groarke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Depicting Visual Arguments: An ART Approach | 1 |
| 2 | 23 | |
| 3 | Doing the PPP: A skeptical perspective | 2 |
| 4 | 50 | |
| 5 | On Dove, visual evidence and verbal repackaging | 4 |
| 6 | Review of Douglas Walton, Chris Reed, Fabrizio macagno, Argumentation Schemes | 1 |
| 7 | 75 | |
| 8 | 37 | |
| 9 | Arguments and Metaphors in Philosophy | 12 |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | The Ethics of the New Economy | 1 |
| 12 | Good Reasoning Matters!:: A Constructive Approach to Critical Thinking | 54 |
| 13 | Toward a Theory of Visual Argument. | 116 |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | Woods and Walton of the Fallacies, 1972-82 | 1 |
| 16 | 13 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 0 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Leo Groarke
Leo Groarke is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, Philosophy and Space and Planetary Science, having authored 43 papers that have together received 603 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (7 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (7 papers) and Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (237 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (148 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (170 citations). Leo Groarke has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David S Birdsell, Christopher W. Tindale, David Godden, Catherine Helen Palczewski, Sarah Tarlow, Douglas P. Lackey, James O. Young, Oliver Leaman, David K.C. Cooper and Chip Colwell‐Chanthaphonh. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business Ethics, Canadian Public Policy and Teaching Philosophy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.