Teaching Philosophy

1.2k papers and 10.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Teaching Philosophy in the last decades have received a total of 10.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Teaching Philosophy usually cover Education (171 papers), Philosophy (165 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (64 papers) specifically the topics of Education and Critical Thinking Development (137 papers), Ethics in medical practice (50 papers) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (39 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Teaching Philosophy are Jan Narveson, Judith André, Robert C. Solomon, Robert H. Ennis, Peter M. Schuller, Fred Johnson, Alex C. Michalos, Joseph P. DeMarco, Richard T. George and Daniel Smith.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Teaching Philosophy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Teaching Philosophy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Teaching Philosophy.

Countries where authors publish in Teaching Philosophy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Teaching Philosophy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Teaching Philosophy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Teaching Philosophy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025