David Godden

665 citations
55 papers · 389 indexed · h-index 11

David Godden

50 papers receiving 354 citations

Peers

David Godden
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Philosophy 177
  • Artificial Intelligence 171
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 83
  • Political Science and International Relations 56
  • Law 49
Replace Jan Albert van Laar with:
Jan Albert van Laar Netherlands
Marcin Lewiński Portugal
Christoph Lumer Italy
Daniel Andler France
John C. McDowell United Kingdom
Antoine Berman Brazil
Augusto Ponzio Italy
Stephen Neale United States
Pierre Swiggers Belgium
James E. Mahon United States
David Godden relative to Jan Albert van Laar Netherlands Jan Albert van Laar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Jan Albert van Laar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Godden

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Godden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Godden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Godden more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Godden

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Godden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Godden. The network helps show where David Godden may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Godden

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Godden. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Godden based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Godden. David Godden is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 2
2 2
3 0
4
Commentary on Petar Bodlović: "Presumptions, burdens of proof, and explanations"
1
5 10
6 1
7 23
8
Pushing the bounds of rationality: Argumentation and extended cognition
4
9 7
10 9
11
On the norms of visual argument
5
12 3
13
Iconicity in Visual and Verbal Argumentation
7
14
Presumptions in argument: Epistemic versus social approaches
3
15 10
16 1
17 1
18
Frans H. van Eemeren and Rob Grootendorst , A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach . Reviewed by
7
19
The Nature and Status of Critical Questions in Argumentation Schemes
18
20
On the Relation of Argumentation and Inference
1

About David Godden

David Godden is a scholar working on Philosophy, General Decision Sciences and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 55 papers that have together received 389 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (19 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (19 papers) and Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (177 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (83 citations) and General Decision Sciences (11 citations). David Godden has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Ghana. Frequent co-authors include Douglas Walton, Catherine Helen Palczewski, Leo Groarke, Frank Zenker, Maurice A. Finocchiaro, John Casey, Frans H. van Eemeren, Douglas Walton, Bart Garssen and Gordon R. Mitchell. Their work appears in journals such as Synthese, Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Artificial Intelligence and Law.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026