Lee Holcombe
Impact in
- History top 1%
- Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Papers in
-
- Historical Gender and Feminism Studies 6
- Canadian Identity and History 1
- Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies 1
-
- Education and Technology Integration 1
- Service-Learning and Community Engagement 1
- Co-authors
- Jane Lewis (1 shared paper)W. J. Reader (1 shared paper)Nancy Fix Anderson (1 shared paper)Ruth Schwartz Cowan (1 shared paper)Bonnie G. Smith (1 shared paper)Mary Lyndon Shanley (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (7 papers)Labour / Le Travail (1 paper)Technology and Culture (1 paper)Labour History (1 paper)University of Toronto Press eBooks (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Lee Holcombe
11 papers receiving 151 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- History 97
- Gender Studies 44
- Sociology and Political Science 121
- Public Administration 9
- Literature and Literary Theory 28
Countries citing papers authored by Lee Holcombe
This map shows the geographic impact of Lee Holcombe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lee Holcombe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lee Holcombe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lee Holcombe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lee Holcombe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lee Holcombe. The network helps show where Lee Holcombe may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Lee Holcombe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1983 | 102 | |
| 2 | 1987 | 56 | |
| 3 | 1974 | 38 | |
| 4 | 1976 | 16 | |
| 5 | Wives and Property | 1983 | 10 |
| 6 | 1989 | 9 | |
| 7 | Technology and teachers: an investigation of attitudes and beliefs of introductory use by preservice teachers | 1998 | 7 |
| 8 | 1975 | 7 | |
| 9 | 1985 | 5 | |
| 10 | 1988 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1985 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1975 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1991 | 0 |
About Lee Holcombe
Lee Holcombe is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Education, Religious studies, Economics and Econometrics and Gender Studies, having authored 14 papers that have together received 255 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (6 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (1 paper), Canadian Identity and History (1 paper), Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment (1 paper), Education and Technology Integration (1 paper), Gender and Technology in Education (1 paper), Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (1 paper) and Service-Learning and Community Engagement (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (97 citations), Gender Studies (44 citations), Sociology and Political Science (121 citations), Public Administration (9 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (28 citations). Lee Holcombe has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jane Lewis, W. J. Reader, Nancy Fix Anderson, Ruth Schwartz Cowan, Bonnie G. Smith and Mary Lyndon Shanley. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Labour / Le Travail, Technology and Culture, Labour History and University of Toronto Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.