Lee C. Rice
Impact in
- Philosophy top 5%
- Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
- Medieval and Classical Philosophy
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Marxism and Critical Theory
-
- Historical Philosophy and Science
Papers in
- Philosophy 20
- Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought 13
- Medieval and Classical Philosophy 8
- Marxism and Critical Theory 5
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 2
- Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education 2
-
- Political Theology and Sovereignty 8
- Co-authors
- Benedictus de Spinoza (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Modern Schoolman (19 papers)History of European Ideas (2 papers)The Monist (1 paper)Teaching Philosophy (1 paper)The Southern Journal of Philosophy (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Lee C. Rice
26 papers receiving 63 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Philosophy 52
- History and Philosophy of Science 12
- Social Psychology 17
- Library and Information Sciences 1
- Sociology and Political Science 25
Countries citing papers authored by Lee C. Rice
This map shows the geographic impact of Lee C. Rice's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lee C. Rice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lee C. Rice more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lee C. Rice
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lee C. Rice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lee C. Rice. The network helps show where Lee C. Rice may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside Lee C. Rice, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1971 | 9 | |
| 2 | 1971 | 9 | |
| 3 | 1994 | 7 | |
| 4 | Emotion, Appetition, and Conatus in Spinoza | 1977 | 6 |
| 5 | 1988 | 6 | |
| 6 | 1985 | 6 | |
| 7 | 1991 | 5 | |
| 8 | 1972 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1994 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1989 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1970 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1994 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1969 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1996 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1990 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1995 | 1 | |
| 18 | Doubt and Belief in the "Tractatus de Intellectus Emendatione" | 1988 | 1 |
| 19 | 1972 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1969 | 1 |
About Lee C. Rice
Lee C. Rice is a scholar working on Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, History and Philosophy of Science, Political Science and International Relations and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 85 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (13 papers), Political Theology and Sovereignty (8 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (8 papers), Marxism and Critical Theory (5 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers), Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (2 papers), History of Science and Medicine (2 papers) and Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (52 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (12 citations), Social Psychology (17 citations), Library and Information Sciences (1 citation) and Sociology and Political Science (25 citations). Lee C. Rice has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Benedictus de Spinoza. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Schoolman, History of European Ideas, The Monist, Teaching Philosophy and The Southern Journal of Philosophy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.