Baruch Spinoza
- Philosophy top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations
- History and Philosophy of Science top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Co-authors
- Samuel ShirleyEdwin CurleySeymour FeldmanJonathan BennettBrad S. GregorySusan M. ShirleyTheo Verbeek
- Topics
- Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (5 papers)Political Theology and Sovereignty (2 papers)Medieval and Classical Philosophy (2 papers)
- Journals
- The Philosophical ReviewDigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library)Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)
In The Last Decade
Baruch Spinoza
8 papers receiving 71 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Philosophy 58
- Sociology and Political Science 33
- Political Science and International Relations 15
- History and Philosophy of Science 12
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 12
Countries citing papers authored by Baruch Spinoza
This map shows the geographic impact of Baruch Spinoza's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Baruch Spinoza with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Baruch Spinoza more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Baruch Spinoza
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Baruch Spinoza. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Baruch Spinoza. The network helps show where Baruch Spinoza may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Baruch Spinoza
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Baruch Spinoza. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Baruch Spinoza based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Baruch Spinoza. Baruch Spinoza is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | Benedicti De Spinoza Opera, Quotquot Reperta Sunt | 0 |
| 4 | Works of Spinoza | 2 |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | A Spinoza Reader: The Ethics and Other Works | 0 |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 61 | |
| 11 | Verhandeling over de verbetering van het verstand | 2 |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | The Road to Inner Freedom: The Ethics | 1 |
| 14 | The Ethics: Ethica Ordine Geometrico Demonstrata | 4 |
About Baruch Spinoza
Baruch Spinoza is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, Philosophy and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 14 papers that have together received 93 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (5 papers), Political Theology and Sovereignty (2 papers) and Medieval and Classical Philosophy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (58 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (12 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (12 citations). Frequent co-authors include Samuel Shirley, Edwin Curley, Seymour Feldman, Jonathan Bennett, Brad S. Gregory, Susan M. Shirley and Theo Verbeek. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) and Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.