Brent Snook
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- Craig BennellJoseph EastwoodPaul TaylorKirk LutherRichard CullenLesley G. KingSarah MacDonaldLaurence Alison
- Topics
- Deception detection and forensic psychology (43 papers)Crime Patterns and Interventions (23 papers)Memory Processes and Influences (22 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaApplied Cognitive PsychologyLaw and Human Behavior
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Brent Snook
82 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Sociology and Political Science 799
- Social Psychology 536
- Clinical Psychology 453
- Cognitive Neuroscience 260
- Epidemiology 181
Countries citing papers authored by Brent Snook
This map shows the geographic impact of Brent Snook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brent Snook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brent Snook more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Brent Snook
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brent Snook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brent Snook. The network helps show where Brent Snook may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brent Snook
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brent Snook. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brent Snook based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Brent Snook. Brent Snook is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 35 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 38 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 21 | |
| 14 | Criminal Profiling Belief and Use: A Study of Canadian Police Officer Opinion. | 11 |
| 15 | 31 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | Man versus machine: The case of geographic profiling. | 2 |
| 18 | Geographic profiling - The debate continues: Ten problems with the Rossmo and Filer defence of computer profiling. | 1 |
| 19 | 52 | |
| 20 | 47 |
About Brent Snook
Brent Snook is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Social Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 86 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Deception detection and forensic psychology (43 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (23 papers) and Memory Processes and Influences (22 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (72 citations), Social Psychology (536 citations) and Clinical Psychology (453 citations). Brent Snook has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Craig Bennell, Joseph Eastwood, Paul Taylor, Kirk Luther, Richard Cullen, Lesley G. King, Sarah MacDonald, Laurence Alison, Rebecca Milne and Paul Gendreau. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Applied Cognitive Psychology and Law and Human Behavior.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.