Mark R. Schmeler

1.9k total citations
70 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Mark R. Schmeler is a scholar working on Occupational Therapy, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark R. Schmeler has authored 70 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 49 papers in Occupational Therapy, 26 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 23 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in Mark R. Schmeler's work include Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (46 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (26 papers) and Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (23 papers). Mark R. Schmeler is often cited by papers focused on Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (46 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (26 papers) and Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (23 papers). Mark R. Schmeler collaborates with scholars based in United States, Brazil and United Kingdom. Mark R. Schmeler's co-authors include Richard M. Schein, Margo B. Holm, Rory A. Cooper, Michael L. Boninger, David M. Brienza, Brad E. Dicianno, Andi Saptono, Jennifer Angelo, Steven Williams and Amie B. Jackson and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society and Expert Systems with Applications.

In The Last Decade

Mark R. Schmeler

64 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Mark R. Schmeler
Rosemarie Cooper United States
Jonathan Pearlman United States
Diane M. Collins United States
Annmarie Kelleher United States
Stephen Sprigle United States
Cher Smith Canada
Charles E. Levy United States
Rosemarie Cooper United States
Mark R. Schmeler
Citations per year, relative to Mark R. Schmeler Mark R. Schmeler (= 1×) peers Rosemarie Cooper

Countries citing papers authored by Mark R. Schmeler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark R. Schmeler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark R. Schmeler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark R. Schmeler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark R. Schmeler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark R. Schmeler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark R. Schmeler. The network helps show where Mark R. Schmeler may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark R. Schmeler

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark R. Schmeler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark R. Schmeler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark R. Schmeler. Mark R. Schmeler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Schein, Richard M., et al.. (2024). Telerehabilitation for New Wheelchair Evaluations: A Retrospective Study of Patient Characteristics. International Journal of Telerehabilitation. 16(1). e6630–e6630.
2.
Schein, Richard M., et al.. (2022). Investigation of factors from assistive technology professionals that impact timeliness of wheelchair service delivery: a cross-sectional study. Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology. 18(8). 1522–1526. 1 indexed citations
3.
Schmeler, Mark R., et al.. (2021). Development and content validation of the Electronic Instrumental activities of daily living Satisfaction Assessment (EISA) outcome tool. Assistive Technology. 36(5). 360–365. 1 indexed citations
4.
Schein, Richard M., Anthony Yang, Gina McKernan, et al.. (2021). Effect of the Assistive Technology Professional on the Provision of Mobility Assistive Equipment. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 102(10). 1895–1901. 6 indexed citations
5.
Cruz, Daniel Marinho Cezar da, et al.. (2020). Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Face Validity of the Functional Mobility Assessment into Brazilian Portuguese. Occupational Therapy International. 2020. 1–7. 8 indexed citations
6.
Faieta, Julie, Brittany N. Hand, Mark R. Schmeler, James A. Oñate, & Carmen DiGiovine. (2020). Health App Review Tool: Matching mobile apps to Alzheimer’s populations (HART Match). Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering. 7. 2483792492–2483792492. 4 indexed citations
7.
Schein, Richard M., et al.. (2020). Functional Mobility Outcomes in Telehealth and In-Person Assessments for Wheeled Mobility Devices. International Journal of Telerehabilitation. 12(2). 27–34. 8 indexed citations
8.
Schmeler, Mark R., et al.. (2019). Functional mobility assessment is reliable and correlated with satisfaction, independence and skills. Assistive Technology. 33(5). 264–270. 16 indexed citations
9.
Schmeler, Mark R., et al.. (2019). Information communication technology-enabled instrumental activities of daily living: a paradigm shift in functional assessment. Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology. 15(7). 746–753. 15 indexed citations
10.
Faieta, Julie, et al.. (2019). Evaluation of the Functional Mobility Assessment Through Rasch Analysis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 101(4). 712–716. 2 indexed citations
11.
Joseph, James, et al.. (2017). Full-participation of students with physical disabilities in science and engineering laboratories. Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology. 13(2). 186–193. 27 indexed citations
12.
Sharma, Vinod, Richard C. Simpson, Edmund LoPresti, & Mark R. Schmeler. (2012). Driving backwards using a semi-autonomous smart wheelchair system DSS: A clinical evaluation. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 9(4). 347–365. 1 indexed citations
13.
Kumar, Amit, Mark R. Schmeler, Amol Karmarkar, et al.. (2012). Test-retest reliability of the functional mobility assessment (FMA): a pilot study. Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology. 8(3). 213–219. 53 indexed citations
14.
Schein, Richard M., Mark R. Schmeler, Margo B. Holm, Andi Saptono, & David M. Brienza. (2010). Telerehabilitation Wheeled Mobility and Seating Assessments Compared With In Person. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 91(6). 874–878. 36 indexed citations
15.
Schein, Richard M., Mark R. Schmeler, Andi Saptono, & David M. Brienza. (2010). Patient Satisfaction with Telerehabilitation Assessments for Wheeled Mobility and Seating. Assistive Technology. 22(4). 215–222. 30 indexed citations
16.
Arva, Julianna, Ginny Paleg, Michelle L. Lange, et al.. (2009). RESNA Position on the Application of Wheelchair Standing Devices. Assistive Technology. 21(3). 161–168. 37 indexed citations
17.
Holm, Margo B., et al.. (2007). Test-Retest Reliability and Cross Validation of the Functioning Everyday With a Wheelchair Instrument. Assistive Technology. 19(2). 61–77. 41 indexed citations
19.
Schmeler, Mark R., et al.. (2003). Telerehabilitation used for wheelchair prescription-video and remote pressure measurement. 2. 679–679. 2 indexed citations
20.
Holm, Margo B., et al.. (2002). Development and consumer validation of the Functional Evaluation in a Wheelchair (FEW) instrument. Disability and Rehabilitation. 24(1-3). 38–46. 67 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026