Laura Schmidt

41 papers receiving 413 citations

Peers

Laura Schmidt
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 32
  • Demography 82
  • Applied Psychology 31
  • Information Systems and Management 35
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 60
Replace Phillip W. Vaughan with:
Phillip W. Vaughan United States
Indira Riadi Canada
James R. Ciesla United States
Daniel Bartholomeu Brazil
Vanessa Loh Australia
Yi‐Han Hu United States
Keith Jacks Gamble United States
Caiyun Hu China
Erin Miller United States
Jahanvash Karim Pakistan
Laura Schmidt relative to Phillip W. Vaughan United States Phillip W. Vaughan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Phillip W. Vaughan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Laura Schmidt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Laura Schmidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laura Schmidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laura Schmidt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Laura Schmidt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laura Schmidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laura Schmidt. The network helps show where Laura Schmidt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Laura Schmidt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Laura Schmidt Line = papers co-authored together Laura Schmidt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202072
2 202238
3 201835
4 201328
5 201926
6 201321
7 202017
8 198517
9 201816
10 198315
11 199311
12 202011
13 202110
14 202210
15 20229
16 20238
17 20228
18 20228
19 20227
20 20157

About Laura Schmidt

Laura Schmidt is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Oncology, Applied Psychology, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 50 papers that have together received 434 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (7 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (7 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (7 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (7 papers), Physical Activity and Health (5 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (4 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (4 papers) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (32 citations), Demography (82 citations), Applied Psychology (31 citations), Information Systems and Management (35 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (60 citations). Laura Schmidt has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Hans‐Werner Wahl, Monika Sieverding, Michael Doh, H. Rommelspacher, Joachim Wiskemann, Karen Steindorf, Nadine Ungar, B. Müller‐Oerlinghausen, R. J. Niemeyer and Anna Schlomann. Their work appears in journals such as Pharmacopsychiatry, Innovation in Aging, Frontiers in Public Health, Supportive Care in Cancer and Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact