Anna Schlomann
- Demography top 2%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Health top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Alexander SeifertChristian RietzSusanne ZankHans‐Werner WahlPeter RascheChristiane WoopenAlexander MertensDominique Alexandra Reinwand
- Topics
- Technology Use by Older Adults (16 papers)Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (8 papers)Aging and Gerontology Research (7 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaDevelopmental PsychologyFrontiers in Psychology
- Partner nations
- GermanySwitzerlandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Anna Schlomann
31 papers receiving 577 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Demography 256
- General Health Professions 165
- Health 107
- Sociology and Political Science 92
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 86
Countries citing papers authored by Anna Schlomann
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Schlomann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Schlomann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Schlomann more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Schlomann
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Schlomann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Schlomann. The network helps show where Anna Schlomann may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna Schlomann
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna Schlomann. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna Schlomann based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna Schlomann. Anna Schlomann is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 22 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 11 | |
| 16 | 54 | |
| 17 | 12 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 58 | |
| 20 | 20 |
About Anna Schlomann
Anna Schlomann is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Demography and Health, having authored 31 papers that have together received 590 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Technology Use by Older Adults (16 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (8 papers) and Aging and Gerontology Research (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (86 citations), Demography (256 citations) and Applied Psychology (81 citations). Anna Schlomann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Alexander Seifert, Christian Rietz, Susanne Zank, Hans‐Werner Wahl, Peter Rasche, Christiane Woopen, Alexander Mertens, Dominique Alexandra Reinwand, Mareike Bünning and Laura Schmidt. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Developmental Psychology and Frontiers in Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.