Laetitia Charalambides

496 total citations
7 papers, 339 citations indexed

About

Laetitia Charalambides is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Marketing. According to data from OpenAlex, Laetitia Charalambides has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 339 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Applied Psychology, 3 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 2 papers in Marketing. Recurrent topics in Laetitia Charalambides's work include Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers) and Environmental Sustainability in Business (2 papers). Laetitia Charalambides is often cited by papers focused on Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers) and Environmental Sustainability in Business (2 papers). Laetitia Charalambides collaborates with scholars based in France, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Laetitia Charalambides's co-authors include Denis Hilton, Laurent Waroquier, Christophe Demarque, Isabelle Régner, Laure Cabantous, Stéphane Vautier, Charles Raux, Nele Dael, Domicelė Jonauskaitė and Christine Möhr and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Environmental Psychology, Sex Roles and Journal of Economic Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Laetitia Charalambides

7 papers receiving 320 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Laetitia Charalambides France	5	125	123	61	60	56	7	339
Margarita Gorlin United States	6	88 0.7×	272 2.2×	73 1.2×	97 1.6×	43 0.8×	6	448
Dennis Hummel Germany	5	59 0.5×	71 0.6×	70 1.1×	77 1.3×	24 0.4×	8	353
Mathias Ekström Norway	8	50 0.4×	48 0.4×	33 0.5×	120 2.0×	52 0.9×	16	309
Ying‐Ching Lin Taiwan	11	152 1.2×	380 3.1×	136 2.2×	143 2.4×	96 1.7×	20	626
Christophe Demarque France	8	177 1.4×	129 1.0×	74 1.2×	92 1.5×	45 0.8×	12	400
Sebastian Lotz Germany	8	80 0.6×	62 0.5×	40 0.7×	241 4.0×	88 1.6×	15	507
Max Vetter Germany	4	121 1.0×	67 0.5×	106 1.7×	71 1.2×	21 0.4×	4	318
Emma Ejelöv Sweden	8	115 0.9×	55 0.4×	55 0.9×	114 1.9×	39 0.7×	13	295
Kellen Mrkva United States	10	21 0.2×	75 0.6×	58 1.0×	96 1.6×	55 1.0×	13	336
Vladimir Melnyk Spain	6	101 0.8×	160 1.3×	70 1.1×	121 2.0×	32 0.6×	11	341

Countries citing papers authored by Laetitia Charalambides

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Laetitia Charalambides's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laetitia Charalambides with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laetitia Charalambides more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Laetitia Charalambides

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laetitia Charalambides. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laetitia Charalambides. The network helps show where Laetitia Charalambides may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Laetitia Charalambides

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Laetitia Charalambides. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Laetitia Charalambides based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Laetitia Charalambides. Laetitia Charalambides is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

Hilton, Denis, et al.. (2021). Making the carbon basket count: Goal setting promotes sustainable consumption in a simulated online supermarket. Journal of Economic Psychology. 83. 102348–102348. 26 indexed citations

Jonauskaitė, Domicelė, et al.. (2018). Pink for Girls, Red for Boys, and Blue for Both Genders: Colour Preferences in Children and Adults. Sex Roles. 80(9-10). 630–642. 47 indexed citations

Hilton, Denis, et al.. (2015). Reasoning about rights and duties: mental models, world knowledge and pragmatic interpretation. Thinking & Reasoning. 22(2). 150–183. 2 indexed citations

Demarque, Christophe, Laetitia Charalambides, Denis Hilton, & Laurent Waroquier. (2015). Nudging sustainable consumption: The use of descriptive norms to promote a minority behavior in a realistic online shopping environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 43. 166–174. 177 indexed citations

Hilton, Denis, Laetitia Charalambides, Christophe Demarque, Laurent Waroquier, & Charles Raux. (2014). A tax can nudge: The impact of an environmentally motivated bonus/malus fiscal system on transport preferences. Journal of Economic Psychology. 42. 17–27. 40 indexed citations

Hilton, Denis, Isabelle Régner, Laure Cabantous, Laetitia Charalambides, & Stéphane Vautier. (2011). Do Positive Illusions Predict Overconfidence in Judgment?A Test Using Interval Production and Probability Evaluation Measures of Miscalibration. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations

Hilton, Denis, Isabelle Régner, Laure Cabantous, Laetitia Charalambides, & Stéphane Vautier. (2010). Do positive illusions predict overconfidence in judgment? A test using interval production and probability evaluation measures of miscalibration. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 24(2). 117–139. 45 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact