L.A. den Hartog
- Animal Science and Zoology top 0.05%
- Small Animals top 0.05%
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 0.5%
- Epidemiology top 5%
- Genetics top 5%
- Co-authors
- B. KempC.M.C. van der Peet–SchweringM.W.A. VerstegenGuus KochJ.W. SchramaP.C. VesseurH.A.M. SpoolderG. Koch
- Topics
- Animal Nutrition and Physiology (87 papers)Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (72 papers)Meat and Animal Product Quality (31 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsSpainCanada
In The Last Decade
L.A. den Hartog
166 papers receiving 3.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
- Animal Science and Zoology 3.2k
- Small Animals 1.6k
- Agronomy and Crop Science 702
- Epidemiology 529
- Genetics 442
Countries citing papers authored by L.A. den Hartog
This map shows the geographic impact of L.A. den Hartog's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L.A. den Hartog with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L.A. den Hartog more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by L.A. den Hartog
This network shows the impact of papers produced by L.A. den Hartog. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L.A. den Hartog. The network helps show where L.A. den Hartog may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of L.A. den Hartog
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of L.A. den Hartog. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of L.A. den Hartog based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with L.A. den Hartog. L.A. den Hartog is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 34 | |
| 4 | 69 | |
| 5 | 27 | |
| 6 | 114 | |
| 7 | Seperation of health, performance roles of probiotics may lead to understanding of mode of action. | 1 |
| 8 | 22 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 45 | |
| 14 | Effect of dietary fat level in the lactation diet on the performance of primiparous sows and their piglets. | 5 |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 96 | |
| 17 | Chemical composition of intra uterine tissue and mammary tissue in pigs as related to stage of pregnancy. | 2 |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | Energie- en eiwitbehoeften van fokzeugen | 1 |
About L.A. den Hartog
L.A. den Hartog is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Small Animals and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 178 papers that have together received 4.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Nutrition and Physiology (87 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (72 papers) and Meat and Animal Product Quality (31 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (3.2k citations), Small Animals (1.6k citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (702 citations). L.A. den Hartog has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Spain and Canada. Frequent co-authors include B. Kemp, C.M.C. van der Peet–Schwering, M.W.A. Verstegen, M.W.A. Verstegen, Guus Koch, J.W. Schrama, P.C. Vesseur, H.A.M. Spoolder, G. Koch and Olav S. de Leeuw. Their work appears in journals such as Environmental Health Perspectives, British Journal Of Nutrition and Journal of Animal Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.