This map shows the geographic impact of L. Veldpaus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L. Veldpaus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L. Veldpaus more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by L. Veldpaus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L. Veldpaus. The network helps show where L. Veldpaus may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of L. Veldpaus
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of L. Veldpaus.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of L. Veldpaus based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with L. Veldpaus. L. Veldpaus is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Pendlebury, John & L. Veldpaus. (2018). Heritage and Brexit. Planning Theory & Practice. 19(3). 448–453.6 indexed citations
7.
Veldpaus, L. & Ana Pereira Roders. (2017). Historic urban landscape approach as a tool for sustainable urban heritage management. TU/e Research Portal (Eindhoven University of Technology). 62–74.6 indexed citations
Veldpaus, L., et al.. (2016). Preserving the historic landscape of a Chinese village: the case of Wujiang, Suzhou, China, in, The HUL Guidebook: Managing heritage in dynamic and constantly changing urban environments. WestminsterResearch (University of Westminster).6 indexed citations
10.
Veldpaus, L.. (2015). Historic urban landscapes : framing the integration of urban and heritage planning in multilevel governance. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).47 indexed citations
Stash, Natalia, et al.. (2013). Creating personalized city tours using the CHIP prototype. TU/e Research Portal. 68–79.1 indexed citations
13.
Veldpaus, L. & Ana Pereira Roders. (2013). Historic urban landscapes : an assessment framework part II. TU/e Research Portal (Eindhoven University of Technology). 1–5.10 indexed citations
14.
Veldpaus, L., et al.. (2013). Knowledge is power : policy analysis of the World Heritage property of Edinburgh. TU/e Research Portal (Eindhoven University of Technology). 4(7). 27–35.3 indexed citations
15.
Roders, Ana Pereira & L. Veldpaus. (2013). Tolerance for change in the built environment : what are the limits?. 17–22.3 indexed citations
16.
Veldpaus, L., Ana Pereira Roders, & Bernard Colenbrander. (2013). Urban Heritage: Putting the Past into the Future. The Historic Environment Policy & Practice. 4(1). 3–18.110 indexed citations
17.
Veldpaus, L., et al.. (2013). Relating the state of authenticity and integrity and the factors affecting World Heritage properties : Island of Mozambique as case study. TU/e Research Portal (Eindhoven University of Technology). 3(1). 81–90.3 indexed citations
18.
Veldpaus, L., et al.. (2012). World Heritage cities : Amsterdam's canal district case study. TU/e Research Portal (Eindhoven University of Technology). 175–186.3 indexed citations
19.
Roders, Ana Pereira, et al.. (2012). Assessing the cultural significance of world heritage cities : the historic centre of Galle as case study. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 75–81.2 indexed citations
20.
Veldpaus, L.. (2011). bOb van Reeth. 42(2). 28–31.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.