Mark Scott
- Urban Studies top 0.2%
- Urban Planning and Governance 20
- Cultural Industries and Urban Development 11
-
- Rural development and sustainability 35
-
- Urban Green Space and Health 12
- Global and Planetary Change top 2%
- Land Use and Ecosystem Services 9
- Transportation top 2%
-
- Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism 15
-
- Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies 13
-
- Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation 10
- Co-authors
- Mick LennonMenelaos GkartziosOwen DouglasDeclan RedmondPeter HowleyEnda MurphyMarcus CollierEoin O’Neill
- Cited by
- Urban StudiesGeneral Agricultural and Biological SciencesHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
- Journals
- Planning Theory & Practice (15 papers)European Planning Studies (9 papers)Journal of Environmental Planning and Management (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- IrelandUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Mark Scott
95 papers receiving 2.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
- Urban Studies 501
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 590
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 701
- Global and Planetary Change 829
- Transportation 256
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Scott
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Scott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Scott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Scott. The network helps show where Mark Scott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 8 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 46 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 10 | |
| 13 | Mainstreaming Green Infrastructure as a Health-Promoting Asset | 2019 | 2 |
| 14 | 2017 | 279 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2014 | 104 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 7 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 17 | |
| 19 | 2006 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2003 | 5 |
About Mark Scott
Mark Scott is a scholar working on Urban Studies, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Finance, having authored 101 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rural development and sustainability (35 papers), Urban Planning and Governance (20 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (15 papers), Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (13 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (12 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (11 papers), Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation (10 papers) and Land Use and Ecosystem Services (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (501 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (590 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (701 citations). Mark Scott has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mick Lennon, Menelaos Gkartzios, Owen Douglas, Declan Redmond, Peter Howley, Enda Murphy, Marcus Collier, Eoin O’Neill, Craig Bullock and Karen Foley. Their work appears in journals such as Planning Theory & Practice, European Planning Studies, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Town Planning Review and Journal of Rural Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.