Mark Scott

3.9k total citations
101 papers, 2.7k citations indexed

About

Mark Scott is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Urban Studies and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Scott has authored 101 papers receiving a total of 2.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 37 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 31 papers in Urban Studies and 23 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Mark Scott's work include Rural development and sustainability (35 papers), Urban Planning and Governance (20 papers) and Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (15 papers). Mark Scott is often cited by papers focused on Rural development and sustainability (35 papers), Urban Planning and Governance (20 papers) and Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (15 papers). Mark Scott collaborates with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and United States. Mark Scott's co-authors include Mick Lennon, Menelaos Gkartzios, Owen Douglas, Declan Redmond, Peter Howley, Enda Murphy, Marcus Collier, Eoin O’Neill, Craig Bullock and Karen Foley and has published in prestigious journals such as Annals of Tourism Research, Sustainability and Land Use Policy.

In The Last Decade

Mark Scott

95 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Scott Ireland 30 829 795 701 590 501 101 2.7k
Dieter Rink Germany 23 1.2k 1.4× 601 0.8× 615 0.9× 411 0.7× 1.6k 3.2× 62 2.8k
Nik Heynen United States 27 1.1k 1.4× 1.4k 1.7× 813 1.2× 305 0.5× 593 1.2× 57 3.9k
Annegret Haase Germany 34 1.7k 2.1× 996 1.3× 943 1.3× 642 1.1× 2.5k 5.0× 104 4.5k
Phil McManus Australia 26 490 0.6× 813 1.0× 170 0.2× 437 0.7× 251 0.5× 104 2.6k
Simin Davoudi United Kingdom 30 1.0k 1.3× 1.4k 1.7× 158 0.2× 286 0.5× 1.0k 2.1× 93 4.2k
Guy M. Robinson Australia 28 1.0k 1.3× 727 0.9× 226 0.3× 586 1.0× 228 0.5× 151 3.5k
Robin Leichenko United States 26 1.7k 2.0× 2.0k 2.5× 301 0.4× 443 0.8× 246 0.5× 65 4.8k
Patrick Brandful Cobbinah Australia 37 1.3k 1.6× 941 1.2× 391 0.6× 104 0.2× 1.5k 2.9× 111 3.7k
Luca Salvati Italy 25 1.2k 1.5× 635 0.8× 173 0.2× 189 0.3× 689 1.4× 166 2.7k
Yuheng Li China 29 2.6k 3.1× 889 1.1× 281 0.4× 2.0k 3.4× 792 1.6× 85 5.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Scott. The network helps show where Mark Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Scott

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Scott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Scott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Scott. Mark Scott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Scott, Mark, Luke Kelleher, & Linda Fox‐Rogers. (2025). Pandemic rural residential mobilities? Towards an understanding of who moved house and why in rural Ireland. Town Planning Review. 96(3). 247–274.
2.
Faulkner, Jon-Paul, Enda Murphy, & Mark Scott. (2024). Downscaling EU bioeconomy policy for national implementation. 9. 100121–100121. 4 indexed citations
3.
Scott, Mark, et al.. (2024). Green infrastructure inequalities in informal settlements. Habitat International. 147. 103058–103058. 11 indexed citations
4.
Faulkner, Jon-Paul, Enda Murphy, & Mark Scott. (2024). Bioeconomy, Planning and Sustainable Development: A Theoretical Framework. Sustainability. 16(19). 8303–8303. 8 indexed citations
5.
Scott, Mark, Gavin Parker, Meri Juntti, et al.. (2024). The Biodiversity Crisis – Planning for Nature Recovery?. Planning Theory & Practice. 25(1). 103–140. 5 indexed citations
6.
Walsh, Cormac, et al.. (2022). Spatial imaginaries in flood risk management: insights from a managed retreat initiative in upper Bavaria. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 66(13). 2668–2690. 2 indexed citations
7.
Lennon, Mick, et al.. (2022). Managed retreat and coastal climate change adaptation: The environmental justice implications and value of a coproduction approach. Land Use Policy. 114. 105960–105960. 33 indexed citations
8.
Gkartzios, Menelaos, Nick Gallent, & Mark Scott. (2022). Rural Places and Planning. Policy Press eBooks. 1 indexed citations
9.
Walsh, Cormac, et al.. (2022). Contextualising coastal management and adaptation: Examining situated practices and path dependencies in Ireland and Germany. Ocean & Coastal Management. 220. 106095–106095. 6 indexed citations
10.
Scott, Mark, et al.. (2021). Managed retreat in response to flooding: lessons from the past for contemporary climate change adaptation. Planning Perspectives. 36(6). 1249–1268. 13 indexed citations
11.
Scott, Mark, Mick Lennon, A.R. Siders, et al.. (2020). Climate Disruption and Planning: Resistance or Retreat?. Planning Theory & Practice. 21(1). 125–154. 46 indexed citations
12.
Scott, Mark, et al.. (2019). Mainstreaming Green Infrastructure as a Health-Promoting Asset. Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology). 88(5). 151–156. 2 indexed citations
13.
Douglas, Owen, Mick Lennon, & Mark Scott. (2017). Green space benefits for health and well-being: A life-course approach for urban planning, design and management. Cities. 66. 53–62. 279 indexed citations
14.
Scott, Mark, et al.. (2015). Negotiating postcolonial legacies: shifting conservation narratives and residual colonial built heritage in Ireland. Town Planning Review. 86(2). 203–228. 6 indexed citations
15.
Lennon, Mick & Mark Scott. (2014). Delivering ecosystems services via spatial planning: reviewing the possibilities and implications of a green infrastructure approach. Town Planning Review. 85(5). 563–587. 104 indexed citations
16.
Murphy, Enda & Mark Scott. (2014). ‘After the crash’: Life satisfaction, everyday financial practices and rural households in post Celtic Tiger Ireland. Journal of Rural Studies. 34. 37–49. 18 indexed citations
17.
Scott, Mark, Craig Bullock, & Karen Foley. (2013). ‘Design matters’: understanding professional, community and consumer preferences for the design of rural housing in the Irish landscape. Town Planning Review. 84(3). 337–370. 7 indexed citations
18.
Scott, Mark, et al.. (2013). Developing researcher skills in research data management: training for the future - a DataPool project report. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 2 indexed citations
19.
Gkartzios, Menelaos & Mark Scott. (2010). Countering counter-urbanisation: Spatial planning challenges in a dispersed city-region, the Greater Dublin Area. Town Planning Review. 81(1). 23–52. 17 indexed citations
20.
Scott, Mark, et al.. (2006). Tax and Disclosure Issues Affecting the Municipal Market. 26(4). 47–63. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026