L. Van Hoof

29 papers receiving 710 citations

Peers

L. Van Hoof
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Food Science 246
  • Pharmacology 98
  • Biochemistry 56
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 70
  • Plant Science 311
Replace Archana Saxena with:
Archana Saxena India
Naveed Munir Pakistan
M.D. Wigg Brazil
Eman K. Rashwan Egypt
Tânia Toledo de Oliveira Brazil
Hwa‐Jung Choi South Korea
Amar P. Garg India
Roziahanim Mahmud Malaysia
Silvia Bittner Fialová Slovakia
R. Subapriya India
L. Van Hoof relative to Archana Saxena India Archana Saxena's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Archana Saxena · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by L. Van Hoof

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of L. Van Hoof's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L. Van Hoof with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L. Van Hoof more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by L. Van Hoof

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by L. Van Hoof. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L. Van Hoof. The network helps show where L. Van Hoof may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside L. Van Hoof, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with L. Van Hoof Line = papers co-authored together L. Van Hoof links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995364
2
Plant products as potential antiviral agents
198699
3 199071
4
Plant antiviral agents; V. 3-Methoxyflavones as potent inhibitors of viral-induced block of cell synthesis.
198471
5 199032
6 198924
7 202118
8 202016
9 201716
10 202114
11 198812
12 202211
13 202010
14 20238
15 19738
16 20237
17 20216
18 20205
19 20234
20 20234

About L. Van Hoof

L. Van Hoof is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, Organic Chemistry and Surgery, having authored 31 papers that have together received 819 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (10 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (10 papers), Elasticity and Material Modeling (4 papers), Synthesis and biological activity (3 papers), Chromatography in Natural Products (2 papers), Synthesis of Organic Compounds (2 papers), Synthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic Compounds (2 papers) and Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (246 citations), Pharmacology (98 citations), Biochemistry (56 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (70 citations) and Plant Science (311 citations). L. Van Hoof has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Arnold Vlietinck, D. A. Vanden Berghe, J. Totté, Dirk Vanden Berghe, A. Lasure, A. J. Vlietinck, George M. Hatfield, Filip Rega, Achiel Haemers and A. G. Herman. Their work appears in journals such as Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, Phytotherapy Research, European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery and Heart.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact