Geert Goderis

71 papers receiving 944 citations

Peers

Geert Goderis
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Family Practice 57
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 44
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 80
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 318
  • General Health Professions 330
Replace Jo‐Anne Manski‐Nankervis with:
Jo‐Anne Manski‐Nankervis Australia
Amol A. Verma Canada
Miranda Andrus United States
Lauren Lapointe‐Shaw Canada
Mark Makowsky Canada
Lama Nazer Jordan
Siew Siang Chua Malaysia
Vincent X. Liu United States
Brook Watts United States
Andrew Steele United States
Geert Goderis relative to Jo‐Anne Manski‐Nankervis Australia Jo‐Anne Manski‐Nankervis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Jo‐Anne Manski‐Nankervis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Geert Goderis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Geert Goderis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Geert Goderis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geert Goderis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Geert Goderis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Geert Goderis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Geert Goderis. The network helps show where Geert Goderis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Geert Goderis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Geert Goderis Line = papers co-authored together Geert Goderis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 75 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201470
2 201665
3 201763
4 201951
5 200949
6 200944
7 201935
8 200933
9 201830
10 201029
11 201629
12 201528
13 202226
14 200826
15 201323
16 201320
17 201819
18 201819
19 202019
20 202018

About Geert Goderis

Geert Goderis is a scholar working on Medical Terminology, Family Practice, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Health Information Management, having authored 75 papers that have together received 967 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chronic Disease Management Strategies (27 papers), Diabetes Management and Education (20 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (14 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (11 papers), Diabetes Treatment and Management (10 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (9 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (6 papers) and Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (57 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (44 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (80 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (318 citations) and General Health Professions (330 citations). Geert Goderis has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Bert Aertgeerts, Bert Vaes, Marjan van den Akker, Liesbeth Borgermans, Frank Buntinx, Chantal Mathieu, Gijs Van Pottelbergh, C. van den Broeke, Jan Heyrman and Richard Grol. Their work appears in journals such as Primary care diabetes, BMJ Open, International Journal of Integrated Care, BMC Geriatrics and European Journal of Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026