L. Starling Reid
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 1
-
- Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes 2
- Categorization, perception, and language 2
-
- Child and Animal Learning Development 1
-
- Structural Health Monitoring Techniques 1
-
- Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet 1
-
- Plant Surface Properties and Treatments 1
-
- Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing 1
- Co-authors
- Frank W. FingerRichard F. DillonKenneth E. LloydAnderson D. SmithPaul R. D’AgostinoEugene A. Lovelace
- Cited by
- Cognitive NeuroscienceExperimental and Cognitive PsychologyDevelopmental and Educational Psychology
- Journals
- Psychological Bulletin (1 paper)The American Journal of Psychology (2 papers)Perception & Psychophysics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
L. Starling Reid
16 papers receiving 312 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Cognitive Neuroscience 132
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 85
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 80
- Behavioral Neuroscience 21
- Social Psychology 67
Countries citing papers authored by L. Starling Reid
This map shows the geographic impact of L. Starling Reid's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L. Starling Reid with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L. Starling Reid more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by L. Starling Reid
This network shows the impact of papers produced by L. Starling Reid. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L. Starling Reid. The network helps show where L. Starling Reid may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 6 scholars most cited alongside L. Starling Reid, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1981 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1974 | 17 | |
| 3 | 1971 | 12 | |
| 4 | 1970 | 29 | |
| 5 | 1969 | 34 | |
| 6 | 1963 | 6 | |
| 7 | 1961 | 12 | |
| 8 | 1960 | 30 | |
| 9 | 1960 | 17 | |
| 10 | 1960 | 7 | |
| 11 | 1960 | 11 | |
| 12 | 1957 | 22 | |
| 13 | 1957 | 13 | |
| 14 | 1954 | 5 | |
| 15 | 1953 | 144 | |
| 16 | 1952 | 38 |
About L. Starling Reid
L. Starling Reid is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Communication, having authored 16 papers that have together received 398 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (2 papers), Categorization, perception, and language (2 papers), Structural Health Monitoring Techniques (1 paper), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1 paper), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (1 paper), Plant Surface Properties and Treatments (1 paper), Child and Animal Learning Development (1 paper) and Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (132 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (85 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (80 citations). L. Starling Reid has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Frank W. Finger, Richard F. Dillon, Kenneth E. Lloyd, Anderson D. Smith, Paul R. D’Agostino and Eugene A. Lovelace. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Bulletin, The American Journal of Psychology and Perception & Psychophysics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.