L. M. H. Wing

50 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

L. M. H. Wing
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 171
  • Medical Terminology 5
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 349
  • Biochemistry 82
  • Pharmacology 170
Replace Anthony Peter Passmore with:
Anthony Peter Passmore United Kingdom
Mauri J. Mattila Finland
Andrew C. Darke Canada
I. W. Reimann Germany
L Paalzow Sweden
William A. Pettinger United States
Cosmo A. DiFazio United States
Brian Milne Canada
Marianne Frisk‐Holmberg Sweden
Kari Aranko Finland
L. M. H. Wing relative to Anthony Peter Passmore United Kingdom Anthony Peter Passmore's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Anthony Peter Passmore · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by L. M. H. Wing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of L. M. H. Wing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L. M. H. Wing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L. M. H. Wing more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by L. M. H. Wing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by L. M. H. Wing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L. M. H. Wing. The network helps show where L. M. H. Wing may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside L. M. H. Wing, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with L. M. H. Wing Line = papers co-authored together L. M. H. Wing links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1977197
2
Syndromes of autism and atypical development
1987167
3 1977118
4 197781
5 197781
6 198467
7 197765
8 202252
9 198839
10 197732
11 198028
12 198626
13 199125
14 197925
15 201325
16 197423
17 198122
18 199022
19 198522
20 198220

About L. M. H. Wing

L. M. H. Wing is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Pharmacology, Physiology and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (10 papers), Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension (5 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (5 papers), Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology (4 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (4 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (3 papers), Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (3 papers) and Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (171 citations), Medical Terminology (5 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (349 citations), Biochemistry (82 citations) and Pharmacology (170 citations). L. M. H. Wing has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include John L. Reid, John Chalmers, Erica Neill, P. Tippett, C. T. Dollery, Malcolm West, D. S. Davies, John R. Graham, D. S. Davies and A. J. C. Bune. Their work appears in journals such as The Medical Journal of Australia, Clinical Radiology, Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact