L. Haegel

18.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
6 papers, 560 citations indexed

About

L. Haegel is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Ocean Engineering and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, L. Haegel has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 560 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 3 papers in Ocean Engineering and 2 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. Recurrent topics in L. Haegel's work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (6 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (4 papers) and Geophysics and Sensor Technology (3 papers). L. Haegel is often cited by papers focused on Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (6 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (4 papers) and Geophysics and Sensor Technology (3 papers). L. Haegel collaborates with scholars based in France, United States and Spain. L. Haegel's co-authors include S. Husa, G. Pratten, A. Bohé, F. Ohme, M. D. Hannam, P. Schmidt, M. Pürrer, C. García-Quirós, M. Colleoni and H. Estellés and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical review. D and Universe.

In The Last Decade

L. Haegel

6 papers receiving 555 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Simple Model of Complete Precessing Black-Hole-Binary Gravitational Waveforms

2014 468 citations M. D. Hannam, P. Schmidt et al. Physical Review Letters profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
L. Haegel France	5	554	112	98	71	50	6	560
Jonathan E. Thompson United Kingdom	9	585 1.1×	93 0.8×	125 1.3×	85 1.2×	47 0.9×	13	603
M. Mateu-Lucena Spain	10	813 1.5×	165 1.5×	179 1.8×	111 1.6×	56 1.1×	10	835
Alessandro Nagar Italy	11	595 1.1×	116 1.0×	144 1.5×	84 1.2×	49 1.0×	14	607
Doreen Müller Germany	7	527 1.0×	80 0.7×	116 1.2×	61 0.9×	45 0.9×	7	549
Keefe Mitman United States	12	463 0.8×	62 0.6×	219 2.2×	36 0.5×	29 0.6×	20	533
V. Gayathri United States	12	638 1.2×	79 0.7×	106 1.1×	43 0.6×	23 0.5×	26	662
M. J. Szczepańczyk United States	11	421 0.8×	85 0.8×	83 0.8×	57 0.8×	24 0.5×	18	437
G. Riemenschneider Italy	7	472 0.9×	117 1.0×	76 0.8×	81 1.1×	21 0.4×	8	481
M. Pitkin United Kingdom	11	381 0.7×	91 0.8×	70 0.7×	100 1.4×	48 1.0×	27	387
P. Ajith Germany	7	581 1.0×	106 0.9×	132 1.3×	80 1.1×	68 1.4×	10	587

Countries citing papers authored by L. Haegel

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of L. Haegel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L. Haegel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L. Haegel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by L. Haegel

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by L. Haegel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L. Haegel. The network helps show where L. Haegel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of L. Haegel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of L. Haegel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of L. Haegel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with L. Haegel. L. Haegel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

6 of 6 papers shown

1.

Narola, Harsh, Justin Janquart, L. Haegel, et al.. (2024). How well can modified gravitational wave propagation be constrained with strong lensing?. Physical review. D. 109(8). 4 indexed citations

2.

Haegel, L., et al.. (2023). Search for anisotropic, birefringent spacetime-symmetry breaking in gravitational wave propagation from GWTC-3. Physical review. D. 107(6). 17 indexed citations

3.

Estellés, H., A. Ramos-Buades, S. Husa, et al.. (2021). Phenomenological time domain model for dominant quadrupole gravitational wave signal of coalescing binary black holes. Physical review. D. 103(12). 50 indexed citations

4.

Bailey, Quentin G., et al.. (2021). Analysis of Birefringence and Dispersion Effects from Spacetime-Symmetry Breaking in Gravitational Waves. Universe. 7(10). 380–380. 18 indexed citations

5.

Hannam, M. D., P. Schmidt, A. Bohé, et al.. (2014). Simple Model of Complete Precessing Black-Hole-Binary Gravitational Waveforms. Physical Review Letters. 113(15). 151101–151101. 468 indexed citations breakdown →

6.

Hannam, Mark, P. Schmidt, A. Bohé, et al.. (2013). Twist and shout: A simple model of complete precessing black-hole-binary gravitational waveforms. arXiv (Cornell University). 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact