M. J. Szczepańczyk

10.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
18 papers, 437 citations indexed

About

M. J. Szczepańczyk is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Geophysics and Nuclear and High Energy Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, M. J. Szczepańczyk has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 437 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 4 papers in Geophysics and 4 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics. Recurrent topics in M. J. Szczepańczyk's work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (17 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (12 papers) and Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (6 papers). M. J. Szczepańczyk is often cited by papers focused on Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (17 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (12 papers) and Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (6 papers). M. J. Szczepańczyk collaborates with scholars based in United States, Italy and Switzerland. M. J. Szczepańczyk's co-authors include V. Gayathri, I. Bartos, S. Klimenko, J. Healy, Manuela Campanelli, R. O’Shaughnessy, P. T. O’Brien, J. Lange, C. O. Loustó and S. Klimenko and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical review. D and The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

In The Last Decade

M. J. Szczepańczyk

16 papers receiving 411 citations

Hit Papers

Eccentricity estimate for black hole mergers with numeric... 2022 2026 2023 2024 2022 50 100 150

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M. J. Szczepańczyk United States 11 421 85 83 57 24 18 437
V. Gayathri United States 12 638 1.5× 79 0.9× 106 1.3× 43 0.8× 23 1.0× 26 662
S. J. Kapadia India 13 567 1.3× 91 1.1× 110 1.3× 76 1.3× 31 1.3× 36 581
C. Pankow United States 9 478 1.1× 107 1.3× 68 0.8× 84 1.5× 24 1.0× 12 484
D. M. Wysocki United States 12 686 1.6× 58 0.7× 114 1.4× 35 0.6× 17 0.7× 16 705
V. Tiwari United Kingdom 11 568 1.3× 123 1.4× 84 1.0× 68 1.2× 25 1.0× 17 582
H. Middleton United Kingdom 10 344 0.8× 36 0.4× 65 0.8× 71 1.2× 16 0.7× 22 368
S. Klimenko United States 6 319 0.8× 70 0.8× 53 0.6× 32 0.6× 19 0.8× 10 330
P. Raffai Hungary 9 385 0.9× 59 0.7× 94 1.1× 32 0.6× 26 1.1× 18 412
M. Pitkin United Kingdom 11 381 0.9× 91 1.1× 70 0.8× 100 1.8× 48 2.0× 27 387
Drew Keppel Germany 12 372 0.9× 80 0.9× 50 0.6× 74 1.3× 22 0.9× 18 382

Countries citing papers authored by M. J. Szczepańczyk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. J. Szczepańczyk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. J. Szczepańczyk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. J. Szczepańczyk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. J. Szczepańczyk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. J. Szczepańczyk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. J. Szczepańczyk. The network helps show where M. J. Szczepańczyk may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. J. Szczepańczyk

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. J. Szczepańczyk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. J. Szczepańczyk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. J. Szczepańczyk. M. J. Szczepańczyk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Mishra, T., et al.. (2025). Gravitational waves detected by a burst search in LIGO/Virgo’s third observing run. Physical review. D. 111(2). 3 indexed citations
2.
Richardson, C. J., Haakon Andresen, Anthony Mezzacappa, et al.. (2024). Detecting Gravitational Wave Memory in the Next Galactic Core-Collapse Supernova. Physical Review Letters. 133(23). 231401–231401. 3 indexed citations
4.
Szczepańczyk, M. J., F. Salemi, S. Bini, et al.. (2023). Search for gravitational-wave bursts in the third Advanced LIGO-Virgo run with coherent WaveBurst enhanced by machine learning. Physical review. D. 107(6). 12 indexed citations
5.
Mishra, T., M. J. Szczepańczyk, G. Vedovato, et al.. (2022). Search for binary black hole mergers in the third observing run of Advanced LIGO-Virgo using coherent WaveBurst enhanced with machine learning. Physical review. D. 105(8). 12 indexed citations
6.
Gill, Kiranjyot, G. Hosseinzadeh, E. Berger, M. Zanolin, & M. J. Szczepańczyk. (2022). Constraining the Time of Gravitational Wave Emission from Core-Collapse Supernovae. arXiv (Cornell University). 5 indexed citations
7.
Gayathri, V., J. Healy, J. Lange, et al.. (2022). Eccentricity estimate for black hole mergers with numerical relativity simulations. Nature Astronomy. 6(3). 344–349. 167 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Richardson, C. J., M. Zanolin, Haakon Andresen, et al.. (2022). Modeling core-collapse supernovae gravitational-wave memory in laser interferometric data. Physical review. D. 105(10). 14 indexed citations
9.
Szczepańczyk, M. J. & M. Zanolin. (2022). Gravitational Waves from a Core-Collapse Supernova: Perspectives with Detectors in the Late 2020s and Early 2030s. Galaxies. 10(3). 70–70. 7 indexed citations
10.
Szczepańczyk, M. J., S. Klimenko, I. Bartos, et al.. (2021). Observing an intermediate-mass black hole GW190521 with minimal assumptions. Physical review. D. 103(8). 18 indexed citations
11.
Drago, M., S. Klimenko, C. Lazzaro, et al.. (2021). coherent WaveBurst, a pipeline for unmodeled gravitational-wave data analysis. SoftwareX. 14. 100678–100678. 50 indexed citations
12.
Szczepańczyk, M. J., V. Gayathri, I. Bartos, et al.. (2021). Detection of LIGO-Virgo binary black holes in the pair-instability mass gap. Physical review. D. 104(8). 10 indexed citations
13.
Mishra, T., V. Gayathri, M. J. Szczepańczyk, et al.. (2021). Optimization of model independent gravitational wave search for binary black hole mergers using machine learning. Physical review. D. 104(2). 15 indexed citations
14.
Gayathri, V., J. Healy, J. Lange, et al.. (2021). Measuring the Hubble Constant with GW190521 as an Eccentric black hole Merger and Its Potential Electromagnetic Counterpart. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 908(2). L34–L34. 32 indexed citations
15.
Vajente, G., Yuping Huang, M. Isi, et al.. (2020). Machine-learning nonstationary noise out of gravitational-wave detectors. Physical review. D. 101(4). 57 indexed citations
16.
Fryer, Chris L., Eric Burns, P. W. A. Roming, et al.. (2019). Core-Collapse Supernovae and Multi-Messenger Astronomy. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 51(3). 122.
17.
Gill, Kiranjyot, M. Branchesi, M. Zanolin, & M. J. Szczepańczyk. (2017). Prospects for Gravitational Wave Searches for Core-Collapse Supernovae within the Local Universe. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2017.
18.
Powell, J., M. J. Szczepańczyk, & I. S. Heng. (2017). Inferring the core-collapse supernova explosion mechanism with three-dimensional gravitational-wave simulations. Physical review. D. 96(12). 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026