F. Ohme

77.8k total citations · 5 hit papers
35 papers, 4.3k citations indexed

About

F. Ohme is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Geophysics and Nuclear and High Energy Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, F. Ohme has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 4.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 35 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 9 papers in Geophysics and 9 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics. Recurrent topics in F. Ohme's work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (35 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (21 papers) and Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (13 papers). F. Ohme is often cited by papers focused on Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (35 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (21 papers) and Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (13 papers). F. Ohme collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Spain. F. Ohme's co-authors include Mark Hannam, S. Husa, S. Khan, M. Pürrer, A. Bohé, Xisco Jiménez Forteza, P. Schmidt, M. D. Hannam, Bernd Brügmann and Katerina Chatziioannou and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical review. D and Classical and Quantum Gravity.

In The Last Decade

F. Ohme

34 papers receiving 4.2k citations

Hit Papers

Frequency-domain gravitat... 2011 2026 2016 2021 2016 2016 2014 2011 2016 200 400 600

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
F. Ohme 4.2k 825 761 585 321 35 4.3k
M. Pürrer 3.7k 0.9× 630 0.8× 755 1.0× 564 1.0× 258 0.8× 38 3.8k
Mark Hannam 2.8k 0.7× 542 0.7× 534 0.7× 404 0.7× 237 0.7× 37 2.9k
A. Bohé 3.2k 0.8× 822 1.0× 581 0.8× 441 0.8× 215 0.7× 27 3.3k
Sebastiano Bernuzzi 5.0k 1.2× 1.2k 1.4× 1.0k 1.3× 847 1.4× 199 0.6× 118 5.2k
E. Thrane 3.3k 0.8× 838 1.0× 438 0.6× 428 0.7× 155 0.5× 109 3.4k
L. S. Finn 3.0k 0.7× 859 1.0× 421 0.6× 363 0.6× 190 0.6× 59 3.1k
J. D. E. Creighton 3.3k 0.8× 1.1k 1.3× 612 0.8× 543 0.9× 182 0.6× 60 3.4k
M. Burgay 4.9k 1.2× 1.3k 1.6× 763 1.0× 839 1.4× 232 0.7× 157 5.1k
Nikolaos Stergioulas 3.3k 0.8× 755 0.9× 750 1.0× 497 0.8× 195 0.6× 98 3.4k
A. Vecchio 2.9k 0.7× 453 0.5× 392 0.5× 476 0.8× 167 0.5× 86 3.0k

Countries citing papers authored by F. Ohme

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Ohme's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Ohme with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Ohme more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Ohme

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Ohme. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Ohme. The network helps show where F. Ohme may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. Ohme

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. Ohme. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. Ohme based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F. Ohme. F. Ohme is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ohme, F., et al.. (2025). Revisiting the relationship of black-hole kicks and multipole asymmetries. Physical review. D. 111(6). 4 indexed citations
2.
Ohme, F., et al.. (2023). Inconsistent black hole kick estimates from gravitational-wave models. Classical and Quantum Gravity. 40(9). 95008–95008. 7 indexed citations
3.
Kastaun, W. & F. Ohme. (2021). Numerical inside view of hypermassive remnant models for GW170817. Physical review. D. 104(2). 8 indexed citations
4.
Setyawati, Y. & F. Ohme. (2021). Adding eccentricity to quasicircular binary-black-hole waveform models. Physical review. D. 103(12). 35 indexed citations
5.
Schäfer, Marlin B., F. Ohme, & A. Nitz. (2020). Detection of gravitational-wave signals from binary neutron star mergers using machine learning. Physical review. D. 102(6). 38 indexed citations
6.
Khan, S., F. Ohme, Katerina Chatziioannou, & Mark Hannam. (2020). Including higher order multipoles in gravitational-wave models for precessing binary black holes. Physical review. D. 101(2). 126 indexed citations
7.
Khan, S., Katerina Chatziioannou, Mark Hannam, & F. Ohme. (2019). Phenomenological model for the gravitational-wave signal from precessing binary black holes with two-spin effects. Physical review. D. 100(2). 156 indexed citations
8.
Kastaun, W. & F. Ohme. (2019). Finite tidal effects in GW170817: Observational evidence or model assumptions?. Physical review. D. 100(10). 23 indexed citations
9.
Dietrich, Tim, S. Khan, Reetika Dudi, et al.. (2019). Matter imprints in waveform models for neutron star binaries: Tidal and self-spin effects. Physical review. D. 99(2). 146 indexed citations
10.
London, L. T., S. Khan, Edward Fauchon-Jones, et al.. (2018). First Higher-Multipole Model of Gravitational Waves from Spinning and Coalescing Black-Hole Binaries. Physical Review Letters. 120(16). 161102–161102. 178 indexed citations
11.
Pürrer, M., Mark Hannam, & F. Ohme. (2016). Can we measure individual black-hole spins from gravitational-wave observations?. Physical review. D. 93(8). 60 indexed citations
12.
Husa, S., S. Khan, Mark Hannam, et al.. (2016). Frequency-domain gravitational waves from nonprecessing black-hole binaries. I. New numerical waveforms and anatomy of the signal. Physical review. D. 93(4). 535 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Schmidt, P., F. Ohme, & Mark Hannam. (2015). Towards models of gravitational waveforms from generic binaries: II. Modelling precession effects with a single effective precession parameter. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 91(2). 243 indexed citations
14.
Hannam, M. D., P. Schmidt, A. Bohé, et al.. (2014). Simple Model of Complete Precessing Black-Hole-Binary Gravitational Waveforms. Physical Review Letters. 113(15). 151101–151101. 468 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Hannam, Mark, P. Schmidt, A. Bohé, et al.. (2013). Twist and shout: A simple model of complete precessing black-hole-binary gravitational waveforms. arXiv (Cornell University). 3 indexed citations
16.
Ohme, F.. (2012). Bridging the Gap between Post-Newtonian Theory and Numerical Relativity in Gravitational-Wave Data Analysis. publish.UP (University of Potsdam). 1 indexed citations
17.
Ajith, P., M Hannam, S. Husa, et al.. (2011). Inspiral-Merger-Ringdown Waveforms for Black-Hole Binaries with Nonprecessing Spins. Physical Review Letters. 106(24). 241101–241101. 406 indexed citations breakdown →
18.
Ohme, F., M. D. Hannam, & S. Husa. (2011). Reliability of complete gravitational waveform models for compact binary coalescences. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 84(6). 36 indexed citations
19.
Ohme, F., M. D. Hannam, S. Husa, & Niall Ó Murchadha. (2009). Stationary hyperboloidal slicings with evolved gauge conditions. Classical and Quantum Gravity. 26(17). 175014–175014. 12 indexed citations
20.
Hannam, M. D., S. Husa, F. Ohme, Bernd Brügmann, & Niall Ó Murchadha. (2008). Wormholes and trumpets: Schwarzschild spacetime for the moving-puncture generation. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 78(6). 63 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026