Countries where authors publish in Physical review. D
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Physical review. D. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Physical review. D with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Physical review. D more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Physical review. D. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Physical review. D.
About Physical review. D
The 34.3k papers published in Physical review. D in the last decades have received a total of 565.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Physical review. D usually cover Nuclear and High Energy Physics (26.9k papers), Astronomy and Astrophysics (19.1k papers) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (4.5k papers) specifically the topics of Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (14.2k papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (12.7k papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (11.9k papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (8.7k papers), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (6.9k papers), High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (6.4k papers), Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (5.4k papers) and Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (3.2k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Physical review. D are Thibault Damour, Sunny Vagnozzi, V. K. Oikonomou, Marc Kamionkowski, Tracy R. Slatyer, Vítor Cardoso, Paolo Pani, Naoki Tsukamoto, Emanuele Berti and Sergei D. Odintsov.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.