G. Pratten

43.4k total citations · 4 hit papers
52 papers, 2.2k citations indexed

About

G. Pratten is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Geophysics and Nuclear and High Energy Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, G. Pratten has authored 52 papers receiving a total of 2.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 51 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 20 papers in Geophysics and 9 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics. Recurrent topics in G. Pratten's work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (44 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (18 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (17 papers). G. Pratten is often cited by papers focused on Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (44 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (18 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (17 papers). G. Pratten collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and Italy. G. Pratten's co-authors include S. Husa, P. Schmidt, A. Ramos-Buades, M. Colleoni, C. García-Quirós, H. Estellés, R. Jaume, M. Mateu-Lucena, M. D. Hannam and M. Pürrer and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and Physical review. D.

In The Last Decade

G. Pratten

52 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Hit Papers

Simple Model of Complete Precessing Black-Hole-Binary Gra... 2014 2026 2018 2022 2014 2021 2020 2020 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
G. Pratten United Kingdom 23 2.1k 421 392 292 142 52 2.2k
P. Ajith India 23 2.1k 1.0× 419 1.0× 345 0.9× 254 0.9× 191 1.3× 48 2.1k
Davide Gerosa United Kingdom 33 2.8k 1.3× 597 1.4× 270 0.7× 153 0.5× 135 1.0× 98 2.9k
P. D. Lasky Australia 31 2.6k 1.2× 658 1.6× 455 1.2× 295 1.0× 144 1.0× 103 2.6k
Mark Hannam United Kingdom 21 2.8k 1.3× 542 1.3× 534 1.4× 404 1.4× 237 1.7× 37 2.9k
S. Babak France 20 1.9k 0.9× 482 1.1× 221 0.6× 220 0.8× 94 0.7× 37 2.0k
V. Raymond United Kingdom 23 2.0k 0.9× 322 0.8× 430 1.1× 385 1.3× 137 1.0× 35 2.0k
A. Nitz Germany 26 2.0k 0.9× 356 0.8× 383 1.0× 253 0.9× 98 0.7× 55 2.0k
A. Vecchio United Kingdom 31 2.9k 1.4× 453 1.1× 392 1.0× 476 1.6× 167 1.2× 86 3.0k
Antoine Klein United States 29 2.6k 1.2× 857 2.0× 223 0.6× 252 0.9× 125 0.9× 48 2.7k
C.‐J. Haster United States 24 1.8k 0.9× 271 0.6× 295 0.8× 237 0.8× 77 0.5× 39 1.9k

Countries citing papers authored by G. Pratten

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Pratten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Pratten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Pratten more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Pratten

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Pratten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Pratten. The network helps show where G. Pratten may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. Pratten

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. Pratten. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. Pratten based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. Pratten. G. Pratten is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Colleoni, M., et al.. (2025). New gravitational waveform model for precessing binary neutron stars with double-spin effects. Physical review. D. 111(6). 5 indexed citations
2.
Davies, G. S., I. W. Harry, M. J. Williams, et al.. (2025). Premerger observation and characterization of massive black hole binaries. Physical review. D. 111(4). 6 indexed citations
3.
Phukon, K. S., P. Schmidt, & G. Pratten. (2025). Geometric template bank for the detection of spinning low-mass compact binaries with moderate orbital eccentricity. Physical review. D. 111(4). 7 indexed citations
4.
Swain, S., G. Pratten, & P. Schmidt. (2025). Strong field scattering of black holes: Assessing resummation strategies. Physical review. D. 111(6). 3 indexed citations
5.
Buscicchio, R., et al.. (2025). Stars or gas? Constraining the hardening processes of massive black-hole binaries with LISA. Physical review. D. 111(2). 5 indexed citations
6.
Pratten, G., et al.. (2025). Strong field scattering of two black holes: Exploring gauge flexibility. Physical review. D. 112(10). 1 indexed citations
7.
Schmidt, P., et al.. (2024). Phenomenological model of gravitational self-force enhanced tides in inspiraling binary neutron stars. Physical review. D. 110(10). 6 indexed citations
8.
Bonino, A., P. Schmidt, & G. Pratten. (2024). Mapping eccentricity evolutions between numerical relativity and effective-one-body gravitational waveforms. Physical review. D. 110(10). 8 indexed citations
9.
Magee, R. M., M. Isi, Ethan Payne, et al.. (2024). Impact of selection biases on tests of general relativity with gravitational-wave inspirals. Physical review. D. 109(2). 8 indexed citations
10.
Middleton, H., C. J. Moore, Siyuan Chen, et al.. (2023). Implications of pulsar timing array observations for LISA detections of massive black hole binaries. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 525(2). 2851–2863. 13 indexed citations
11.
Bonino, A., Rossella Gamba, P. Schmidt, et al.. (2023). Inferring eccentricity evolution from observations of coalescing binary black holes. Physical review. D. 107(6). 34 indexed citations
12.
Pratten, G., Antoine Klein, C. J. Moore, et al.. (2023). LISA science performance in observations of short-lived signals from massive black hole binary coalescences. Physical review. D. 107(12). 13 indexed citations
13.
Gompertz, B. P., et al.. (2023). A multimessenger model for neutron star–black hole mergers. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 526(3). 4585–4598. 12 indexed citations
14.
Pratten, G., P. Schmidt, H. Middleton, & A. Vecchio. (2023). Precision tracking of massive black hole spin evolution with LISA. Physical review. D. 108(12). 11 indexed citations
15.
Pratten, G., et al.. (2022). Impact of Dynamical Tides on the Reconstruction of the Neutron Star Equation of State. Physical Review Letters. 129(8). 81102–81102. 43 indexed citations
16.
Gompertz, B. P., M. Nicholl, P. Schmidt, G. Pratten, & A. Vecchio. (2021). Constraints on compact binary merger evolution from spin-orbit misalignment in gravitational-wave observations. arXiv (Cornell University). 24 indexed citations
17.
Pratten, G., P. Schmidt, R. Buscicchio, & L. M. Thomas. (2020). On measuring precession in GW190814-like asymmetric compact binaries. arXiv (Cornell University). 1 indexed citations
18.
Buscicchio, R., C. J. Moore, G. Pratten, et al.. (2020). Constraining the Lensing of Binary Black Holes from Their Stochastic Background. Physical Review Letters. 125(14). 141102–141102. 22 indexed citations
19.
Pratten, G.. (2015). Covariant perturbations of f(R) black holes: the Weyl terms. Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex). 5 indexed citations
20.
Hannam, Mark, P. Schmidt, A. Bohé, et al.. (2013). Twist and shout: A simple model of complete precessing black-hole-binary gravitational waveforms. arXiv (Cornell University). 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026