Kylie Smith

19 papers receiving 216 citations

Peers

Kylie Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Research and Theory 24
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 11
  • General Health Professions 89
  • Clinical Psychology 66
  • Social Psychology 41
Replace Anja Terkamo‐Moisio with:
Anja Terkamo‐Moisio Finland
Alice Kramer United States
Carol McDonald Canada
Narelle Biedermann Australia
Mary Bishop United States
Jennifer Harris United Kingdom
Marjorie McIntyre Canada
Elisabeth Dahlborg Lyckhage Sweden
Handan Alan Türkiye
Regina María dos Santos Brazil
Kylie Smith relative to Anja Terkamo‐Moisio Finland Anja Terkamo‐Moisio's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Anja Terkamo‐Moisio · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kylie Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kylie Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kylie Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kylie Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kylie Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kylie Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kylie Smith. The network helps show where Kylie Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kylie Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kylie Smith Line = papers co-authored together Kylie Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201551
2 202034
3 201123
4 201819
5 202116
6 201212
7 201412
8 202011
9 201310
10 20199
11 20218
12 20168
13 20107
14
Dr. James Barry: military man--or woman?
19822
15 20182
16 20212
17
The view from the coal face: barriers and strategies for encouraging nurses into academic careers
20102
18 20121
19
Pictures of Words: The Importance of Visual Strategies in Tutoring Writing
20191
20 20230

About Kylie Smith

Kylie Smith is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, History and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 28 papers that have together received 230 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (6 papers), Nursing education and management (4 papers), Medical History and Research (3 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (3 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (3 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (2 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (2 papers) and Race, History, and American Society (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (24 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (11 citations), General Health Professions (89 citations), Clinical Psychology (66 citations) and Social Psychology (41 citations). Kylie Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Foth, Priscilla Robinson, Helen E. Miller, Samantha Thomas, Patrick A Crookes, Sandra C. Jones, Athena D. F. Sherman, Kristen D. Clark, Meredith Klepper and Andrea N. Cimino. Their work appears in journals such as Nurse Education Today, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Youth Studies, Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing and The Journal of Southern History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact