Thomas Foth

1.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
31 papers, 730 citations indexed

About

Thomas Foth is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas Foth has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 730 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 11 papers in General Health Professions and 9 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Thomas Foth's work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (5 papers), Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (4 papers) and Foucault, Power, and Ethics (3 papers). Thomas Foth is often cited by papers focused on Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (5 papers), Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (4 papers) and Foucault, Power, and Ethics (3 papers). Thomas Foth collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Germany. Thomas Foth's co-authors include Lee‐Anne Ufholz, Susan Humphrey‐Murto, Timothy J. Wood, Lara Varpio, Carol Gonsalves, Carol Wang, Dave Holmes, Brandi Vanderspank‐Wright, Nikolaos Efstathiou and Kylie Smith and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Academic Medicine and International Journal of Nursing Studies.

In The Last Decade

Thomas Foth

31 papers receiving 718 citations

Hit Papers

The Use of the Delphi and Other Consensus Group Methods i... 2017 2026 2020 2023 2017 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Thomas Foth Canada 11 349 216 179 76 54 31 730
Tanisha Belton United States 4 181 0.5× 202 0.9× 150 0.8× 107 1.4× 43 0.8× 8 575
Lee‐Anne Ufholz Canada 8 265 0.8× 141 0.7× 177 1.0× 25 0.3× 46 0.9× 11 637
Melanie Jones United Kingdom 10 206 0.6× 213 1.0× 99 0.6× 131 1.7× 46 0.9× 18 651
Lynn M. Meadows Canada 15 171 0.5× 264 1.2× 133 0.7× 125 1.6× 58 1.1× 39 741
Jacinta Leavell United States 4 303 0.9× 436 2.0× 180 1.0× 209 2.8× 47 0.9× 7 1.1k
Kyeung Mi Oh United States 18 172 0.5× 342 1.6× 120 0.7× 97 1.3× 27 0.5× 49 848
Elizabeth N. Chapman United States 6 189 0.5× 312 1.4× 268 1.5× 123 1.6× 67 1.2× 9 950
Janeth Leksell Sweden 17 138 0.4× 387 1.8× 152 0.8× 73 1.0× 99 1.8× 66 1.1k
Ruqaiijah Yearby United States 10 294 0.8× 420 1.9× 122 0.7× 178 2.3× 63 1.2× 37 949
Tania Huria New Zealand 15 230 0.7× 312 1.4× 222 1.2× 128 1.7× 150 2.8× 27 862

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Foth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Foth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Foth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Foth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Foth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Foth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Foth. The network helps show where Thomas Foth may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Foth

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Foth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Foth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Foth. Thomas Foth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Foth, Thomas, et al.. (2024). Quiet quitting: Obedience a minima as a form of nursing resistance. Nursing Philosophy. 25(3). e12493–e12493. 9 indexed citations
2.
Jacob, Jean Daniel, et al.. (2022). Nurses and the Discursive Construction of Procedural Justice in Review Board Hearings. 14(2). 11–22. 4 indexed citations
3.
Jacob, Jean Daniel, et al.. (2021). (Re)construction identitaire et pratique infirmière en psychiatrie légale : réflexion critique sur les commissions d’examen. Recherche en soins infirmiers. N° 143(4). 118–126. 4 indexed citations
4.
Larocque, Catherine & Thomas Foth. (2021). Which lives are worth saving? Biolegitimacy and harm reduction during COVID‐19. Nursing Inquiry. 28(4). e12417–e12417. 3 indexed citations
5.
Larocque, Catherine, Thomas Foth, & Wendy Gifford. (2021). No more settler tears, no more humanitarian consternation: Recognizing our racist history and present NOW!. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(1). 7–10. 6 indexed citations
6.
Foth, Thomas, et al.. (2020). Conflicting interests: Critiquing the place of “institutional reputation” in research ethics reviews. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 11(2). 27–34. 1 indexed citations
7.
Foth, Thomas. (2020). Humanitarian reason and the movement for overdose prevention sites: The NGOization of the Opioid “Crisis”. Nursing Philosophy. 22(1). e12324–e12324. 4 indexed citations
8.
Foth, Thomas, et al.. (2019). Rethinking the social role of nursing through the work of Donzelot and Foucault  . SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1(1). 49–58. 2 indexed citations
9.
Foth, Thomas & Dave Holmes. (2018). Governing through lifestyle—Lalonde and the biopolitical management of public health in Canada. Nursing Philosophy. 19(4). e12222–e12222. 5 indexed citations
10.
Humphrey‐Murto, Susan, Lara Varpio, Timothy J. Wood, et al.. (2017). The Use of the Delphi and Other Consensus Group Methods in Medical Education Research: A Review. Academic Medicine. 92(10). 1491–1498. 367 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Foth, Thomas & Dave Holmes. (2016). Neoliberalism and the government of nursing through competency‐based education. Nursing Inquiry. 24(2). 37 indexed citations
12.
Humphrey‐Murto, Susan, Lara Varpio, Timothy J. Wood, et al.. (2016). The Use of the Delphi and Other Consensus Group Methods in Medical Education. Academic Medicine. 91(11). S11–S11. 10 indexed citations
13.
Foth, Thomas, Patrick O’Byrne, & Dave Holmes. (2015). Health prevention in the era of biosocieties: a critical analysis of the ‘Seek‐and‐Treat’ paradigm inHIV/AIDSprevention. Nursing Inquiry. 23(2). 99–108. 3 indexed citations
14.
Foth, Thomas, et al.. (2015). The Long Way Toward Cooperation. Global Qualitative Nursing Research. 2. 2307157825–2307157825. 9 indexed citations
15.
Foth, Thomas. (2013). Moving beyond Borders: A History of Black Canadian and Caribbean Women in the Diaspora. Nursing History Review. 21. 151. 1 indexed citations
16.
Foth, Thomas. (2013). Understanding ‘caring’ through biopolitics: the case of nurses under the Nazi regime. Nursing Philosophy. 14(4). 284–294. 11 indexed citations
17.
Foth, Thomas. (2013). Caring and Killing. V&R unipress eBooks. 10 indexed citations
18.
Foth, Thomas. (2012). Nurses, medical records and the killing of sick persons before, during and after the Nazi regime in Germany. Nursing Inquiry. 20(2). 93–100. 12 indexed citations
19.
Foth, Thomas, et al.. (2012). Allgemeinmedizin und Pflege in der ambulanten und heimstationären Versorgung. 3 indexed citations
20.
Foth, Thomas. (2009). Biopolitical Spaces, Vanished Death, & the Power of Vulnerablility in Nursing. 1(4). 16–26. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026