Kingsley Amis
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 2
- Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies 1
- Themes in Literature Analysis 1
- Borges, Kipling, and Jewish Identity 1
- Education top 10%
-
- Digital Games and Media 2
-
- Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction 2
-
- Gothic Literature and Media Analysis 1
-
- Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices 1
- Co-authors
- Peter FirchowHugh ThomasZachary LeaderÓscar WildeVladimir NabokovJohn HawkesGünter GrassMilovan Djilas
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Kingsley Amis
33 papers receiving 146 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Literature and Literary Theory 32
- Education 81
- Political Science and International Relations 58
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 10
- Linguistics and Language 9
Countries citing papers authored by Kingsley Amis
This map shows the geographic impact of Kingsley Amis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kingsley Amis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kingsley Amis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kingsley Amis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kingsley Amis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kingsley Amis. The network helps show where Kingsley Amis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Kingsley Amis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New maps of hell : a survey of science fiction | 2012 | 13 |
| 2 | Nepřítel mého nepřítele | 2005 | 1 |
| 3 | The Letters of Kingsley Amis | 2001 | 3 |
| 4 | The Russian girl | 1992 | 1 |
| 5 | 1988 | 4 | |
| 6 | Every day drinking | 1983 | 1 |
| 7 | Everyday Drinking: The Distilled Kingsley Amis | 1983 | 2 |
| 8 | Collected short stories | 1980 | 3 |
| 9 | The New Oxford Book of Light Verse | 1979 | 5 |
| 10 | Jake's Thing | 1978 | 1 |
| 11 | The Faber popular reciter | 1978 | 1 |
| 12 | 1975 | 1 | |
| 13 | Rudyard Kipling and his world | 1975 | 7 |
| 14 | 1971 | 2 | |
| 15 | Penguin modern stories. | 1969 | 1 |
| 16 | The James Bond Dossier | 1965 | 11 |
| 17 | 1964 | 0 | |
| 18 | New Maps of Hell | 1960 | 4 |
| 19 | 1957 | 1 | |
| 20 | Poems and essays | 1956 | 1 |
About Kingsley Amis
Kingsley Amis is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Music and Philosophy, having authored 42 papers that have together received 232 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Games and Media (2 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (2 papers), Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction (2 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (1 paper), Themes in Literature Analysis (1 paper), Borges, Kipling, and Jewish Identity (1 paper), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (1 paper) and Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (32 citations), Education (81 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (58 citations). Kingsley Amis has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Peter Firchow, Hugh Thomas, Zachary Leader, Óscar Wilde, Vladimir Nabokov, John Hawkes, Günter Grass, Milovan Djilas, William H. Gass and Philip Booth. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, World Literature Today and Contemporary Literature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.