Philip Booth

97 total papers · 953 total citations
40 papers, 549 citations indexed

About

Philip Booth is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Urban Studies and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip Booth has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 549 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 12 papers in Urban Studies and 4 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Recurrent topics in Philip Booth's work include French Urban and Social Studies (13 papers), Urbanization and City Planning (6 papers) and Rural development and sustainability (4 papers). Philip Booth is often cited by papers focused on French Urban and Social Studies (13 papers), Urbanization and City Planning (6 papers) and Rural development and sustainability (4 papers). Philip Booth collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Kenya and Switzerland. Philip Booth's co-authors include Bernard Jouve, Ben Rickayzen, Steven Haberman, Richard Stephenson, Tom Stafford, I. Dawson, M. Gläser, P. Dervan, Rosemary Harper and C. M. Buttar and has published in prestigious journals such as Land Use Policy, Regional Studies and Environment and Planning B Planning and Design.

In The Last Decade

Philip Booth

39 papers receiving 490 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Philip Booth 299 136 113 110 79 40 549
Alex Lord 233 0.8× 119 0.9× 146 1.3× 194 1.8× 98 1.2× 44 601
Frank Othengrafen 230 0.8× 75 0.6× 106 0.9× 149 1.4× 59 0.7× 37 575
Juliet Carpenter 265 0.9× 80 0.6× 200 1.8× 89 0.8× 79 1.0× 33 588
Barry Cullingworth 213 0.7× 76 0.6× 85 0.8× 83 0.8× 84 1.1× 17 497
David Counsell 228 0.8× 79 0.6× 81 0.7× 201 1.8× 59 0.7× 24 521
Kristian Olesen 249 0.8× 66 0.5× 81 0.7× 147 1.3× 43 0.5× 26 484
Malcolm Tait 307 1.0× 131 1.0× 175 1.5× 118 1.1× 36 0.5× 25 616
Raymond Bunker 270 0.9× 141 1.0× 107 0.9× 46 0.4× 97 1.2× 59 611
Nicky Morrison 218 0.7× 175 1.3× 123 1.1× 73 0.7× 140 1.8× 38 515
Rachelle Alterman 225 0.8× 70 0.5× 154 1.4× 61 0.6× 114 1.4× 44 611

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Booth. The network helps show where Philip Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Booth

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Booth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Booth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Booth. Philip Booth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026