Kinglun Ngok

952 citations
44 papers · 545 indexed · h-index 12

Kinglun Ngok

39 papers receiving 480 citations

Peers

Kinglun Ngok
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Public Administration 86
  • Political Science and International Relations 325
  • Communication 37
  • Demography 60
  • Sociology and Political Science 191
Replace Menno Fenger with:
Menno Fenger Netherlands
Stein Kuhnle Norway
Marian Sawer Australia
Hagen Koo United States
Thomas Klikauer Australia
Mette Kjærgaard Thomsen Denmark
John Schwarzmantel United Kingdom
Joaquín Artés Spain
Gail M. McGuire United States
Staffan Kumlin Norway
Kinglun Ngok relative to Menno Fenger Netherlands Menno Fenger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Menno Fenger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kinglun Ngok

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kinglun Ngok's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kinglun Ngok with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kinglun Ngok more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kinglun Ngok

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kinglun Ngok. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kinglun Ngok. The network helps show where Kinglun Ngok may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Kinglun Ngok, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kinglun Ngok Line = papers co-authored together Kinglun Ngok links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20244
2 20241
3 20230
4 20183
5 20168
6 20150
7 20148
8 20140
9 201313
10 20120
11 201210
12 20115
13 201030
14 200841
15 200871
16
Marketization, Globalization and Administrative Reform in China: A Zigzag Road to a Promising Future
20079
17 200743
18 20046
19
New Collective Labor Relation Mechanisms in the Workplace: The Collective Contract System in Mainland China
19992
20
Unemployment and Policy Responses in Mainland China
19977

About Kinglun Ngok

Kinglun Ngok is a scholar working on Public Administration, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 44 papers that have together received 545 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (23 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (12 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (5 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (5 papers), Higher Education Governance and Development (5 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (4 papers), China's Global Influence and Migration (3 papers) and Employment and Welfare Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (86 citations), Political Science and International Relations (325 citations) and Communication (37 citations). Kinglun Ngok has collaborated with scholars based in China, Hong Kong and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Weiqing Guo, Joseph Y. S. Cheng, Linda Wong, Yan Huang, Arie Halachmi, David W. Chan, Chak Kwan Chan, Ka Ho Mok, Hon S. Chan and Michael H. Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Public Administration Review, Social Indicators Research and International Review of Administrative Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026