Kim‐Pong Tam

5.3k total citations · 2 hit papers
84 papers, 3.7k citations indexed

About

Kim‐Pong Tam is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. According to data from OpenAlex, Kim‐Pong Tam has authored 84 papers receiving a total of 3.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 54 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 38 papers in Social Psychology and 32 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. Recurrent topics in Kim‐Pong Tam's work include Environmental Education and Sustainability (32 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (28 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (25 papers). Kim‐Pong Tam is often cited by papers focused on Environmental Education and Sustainability (32 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (28 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (25 papers). Kim‐Pong Tam collaborates with scholars based in Hong Kong, United States and Singapore. Kim‐Pong Tam's co-authors include Hoi‐Wing Chan, Chi‐yue Chiu, Ivy Yee‐Man Lau, Melody Manchi Chao, Angela K.‐Y. Leung, Sau-lai Lee, Taciano L. Milfont, Xi Zou, Michael W. Morris and Ching Wan and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, World Development and Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.

In The Last Decade

Kim‐Pong Tam

78 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Hit Papers

Concepts and measures related to connection to nature: Si... 2013 2026 2017 2021 2013 2023 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kim‐Pong Tam Hong Kong 30 1.7k 1.5k 1.3k 603 592 84 3.7k
Gerhard Reese Germany 30 1.7k 1.0× 696 0.5× 1.3k 1.0× 371 0.6× 357 0.6× 79 2.9k
Valdiney Velôso Gouveia Brazil 30 1.4k 0.8× 1.7k 1.1× 981 0.7× 585 1.0× 135 0.2× 257 4.1k
Donald W. Hine Australia 39 1.5k 0.9× 1.0k 0.7× 753 0.6× 245 0.4× 255 0.4× 122 4.5k
Ezra M. Markowitz United States 29 2.5k 1.4× 451 0.3× 1.9k 1.4× 472 0.8× 316 0.5× 79 4.3k
Immo Fritsche Germany 33 2.1k 1.2× 1.3k 0.9× 1.1k 0.9× 350 0.6× 104 0.2× 82 3.4k
Cynthia McPherson Frantz United States 14 1.3k 0.7× 1.6k 1.0× 1.7k 1.3× 356 0.6× 1.8k 3.1× 26 4.0k
Janet K. Swim United States 48 6.1k 3.6× 2.5k 1.7× 1.9k 1.5× 489 0.8× 423 0.7× 121 9.6k
David Uzzell United Kingdom 32 2.5k 1.4× 695 0.5× 1.4k 1.0× 705 1.2× 732 1.2× 115 5.0k
Siegfried Dewitte Belgium 39 1.6k 0.9× 1.2k 0.8× 1.0k 0.8× 1.2k 1.9× 213 0.4× 145 5.0k
Winnifred R. Louis Australia 47 4.1k 2.4× 2.0k 1.4× 1.5k 1.1× 920 1.5× 153 0.3× 193 6.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Kim‐Pong Tam

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kim‐Pong Tam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim‐Pong Tam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim‐Pong Tam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kim‐Pong Tam

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim‐Pong Tam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim‐Pong Tam. The network helps show where Kim‐Pong Tam may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kim‐Pong Tam

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kim‐Pong Tam. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kim‐Pong Tam based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kim‐Pong Tam. Kim‐Pong Tam is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
3.
4.
Tam, Kim‐Pong & Hoi‐Wing Chan. (2025). Perception of global norm of government climate action and support for domestic climate policies. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 106. 102694–102694. 1 indexed citations
6.
Ratcliffe, Eleanor, Charles Musselwhite, Hebba Haddad, et al.. (2025). Research trends in environmental psychology: A bibliometric analysis of peer-reviewed publications, 2004-2024. Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften digital collection (Zurich University of Applied Sciences).
7.
Chan, Hoi‐Wing, Lin Li, Kim‐Pong Tam, & Ying‐yi Hong. (2024). From negative feelings to impairments: A longitudinal study on the development of climate change anxiety. Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 107. 102917–102917. 8 indexed citations
8.
Chan, Hoi‐Wing, Xue Wang, Kim‐Pong Tam, Ying‐yi Hong, & Bo Huang. (2024). Hotter weather, less of a hoax? Testing the longitudinal association between experience of temperature anomalies and belief in climate change conspiracy theories. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 98. 102409–102409. 3 indexed citations
9.
Chan, Hoi‐Wing, Kim‐Pong Tam, & Susan Clayton. (2024). Testing an integrated model of climate change anxiety. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 97. 102368–102368. 7 indexed citations
10.
Tam, Kim‐Pong, Hoi‐Wing Chan, & Susan Clayton. (2023). Climate change anxiety in China, India, Japan, and the United States. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 87. 101991–101991. 63 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Chan, Hoi‐Wing, Kim‐Pong Tam, & Ying‐yi Hong. (2023). Does belief in climate change conspiracy theories predict everyday life pro-environmental behaviors? Testing the longitudinal relationship in China and the U.S.. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 87. 101980–101980. 12 indexed citations
12.
Tam, Kim‐Pong & Hoi‐Wing Chan. (2023). Conspiracy theories and climate change: A systematic review. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 91. 102129–102129. 18 indexed citations
13.
Chan, Hoi‐Wing, et al.. (2021). Effects of perceived social norms on support for renewable energy transition: Moderation by national culture and environmental risks. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 79. 101750–101750. 46 indexed citations
14.
Chan, Hoi‐Wing & Kim‐Pong Tam. (2020). Exploring the association between climate change concern and mitigation behaviour between societies: A person‐context interaction approach. Asian Journal Of Social Psychology. 24(2). 184–197. 23 indexed citations
15.
Cheung, Hubert, Lorraine Mazerolle, Hugh P. Possingham, Kim‐Pong Tam, & Duan Biggs. (2020). A methodological guide for translating study instruments in cross‐cultural research: Adapting the ‘connectedness to nature’ scale into Chinese. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 11(11). 1379–1387. 23 indexed citations
16.
Chan, Hoi‐Wing, et al.. (2019). Explaining participation in Earth Hour: the identity perspective and the theory of planned behavior. Climatic Change. 158(3-4). 309–325. 21 indexed citations
17.
Ando, Kaori, et al.. (2019). Persuasion Game: Cross Cultural Comparison. Simulation & Gaming. 50(5). 532–555. 5 indexed citations
18.
Schultz, Wesley, et al.. (2016). Environmental Psychology. International Journal of Psychology. 51(S1). 559–568. 1 indexed citations
19.
Zou, Xi, Kim‐Pong Tam, Michael L. Morris, et al.. (2009). Culture as Common Sense: Perceived Consensus vs. Personal Beliefs as Mechanisms of Cultural Influence. SSRN Electronic Journal. 23 indexed citations
20.
Zou, Xi, Kim‐Pong Tam, Michael W. Morris, et al.. (2009). Culture as common sense: Perceived consensus versus personal beliefs as mechanisms of cultural influence.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 97(4). 579–597. 264 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026