Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Predicted growth in plastic waste exceeds efforts to mitigate plastic pollution
20202.0k citationsStephanie B. Borrelle, Jeremy Ringma et al.Scienceprofile →
Sixteen years of change in the global terrestrial human footprint and implications for biodiversity conservation
20161.2k citationsHugh P. Possingham, James Watson et al.Nature Communicationsprofile →
Recruitment Dynamics in Complex Life Cycles
1988991 citationsHugh P. Possingham et al.Scienceprofile →
Zero tolerance ecology: improving ecological inference by modelling the source of zero observations
2005711 citationsTara G. Martin, Jonathan R. Rhodes et al.profile →
Assisted Colonization and Rapid Climate Change
2008674 citationsHugh P. Possingham et al.Scienceprofile →
Countries citing papers authored by Hugh P. Possingham
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Hugh P. Possingham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hugh P. Possingham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hugh P. Possingham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hugh P. Possingham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hugh P. Possingham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hugh P. Possingham. The network helps show where Hugh P. Possingham may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hugh P. Possingham
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hugh P. Possingham.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hugh P. Possingham based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Hugh P. Possingham. Hugh P. Possingham is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Baldwin, Robert F., Stephen C. Trombulak, Paul B. Leonard, et al.. (2017). The Future of Landscape Conservation. BioScience. 68(2). 60–63.49 indexed citations
8.
Studds, Colin E., Bruce E. Kendall, Nicholas Murray, et al.. (2017). Rapid population decline in migratory shorebirds relying on Yellow Sea tidal mudflats as stopover sites. Nature Communications. 8(1). 14895–14895.376 indexed citations breakdown →
Supriatna, Asep K., Geoffrey N. Tuck, & Hugh P. Possingham. (2003). On the exploitation of a two-patch metapopulation with delayed juvenile recruitment and predation. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 8(2). 139–150.2 indexed citations
18.
Field, Scott A., et al.. (2001). Observer error and statistical power: evaluating survey reliability for conservation management. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 2. 831–836.1 indexed citations
19.
Possingham, Hugh P., et al.. (2000). Effects of soil disturbance and weed removal on germination within woodlands infested by boneseed (Chrysanthemoides monilifera ssp. monilifera).. Plant protection quarterly. 15(1). 6–13.5 indexed citations
20.
Possingham, Hugh P.. (1986). The Funereal Cockatoo on Eyre Peninsula. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 30. 1–4.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.