Kimberly E. Vanderbilt

545 total citations
9 papers, 368 citations indexed

About

Kimberly E. Vanderbilt is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Kimberly E. Vanderbilt has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 368 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 2 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Kimberly E. Vanderbilt's work include Child and Animal Learning Development (9 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (3 papers) and Behavioral and Psychological Studies (2 papers). Kimberly E. Vanderbilt is often cited by papers focused on Child and Animal Learning Development (9 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (3 papers) and Behavioral and Psychological Studies (2 papers). Kimberly E. Vanderbilt collaborates with scholars based in United States. Kimberly E. Vanderbilt's co-authors include Gail D. Heyman, David Liu, David Liu, Michael T. Rizzo and Laura Elenbaas and has published in prestigious journals such as Child Development, Developmental Psychology and Cognitive Science.

In The Last Decade

Kimberly E. Vanderbilt

9 papers receiving 362 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kimberly E. Vanderbilt United States 7 272 138 107 102 89 9 368
Lili Ma Canada 11 304 1.1× 103 0.7× 90 0.8× 139 1.4× 144 1.6× 18 453
Lucas P. Butler United States 12 384 1.4× 120 0.9× 102 1.0× 136 1.3× 145 1.6× 20 519
Zhen Wu China 12 259 1.0× 108 0.8× 102 1.0× 134 1.3× 57 0.6× 29 423
Bahar Köymen United Kingdom 15 372 1.4× 87 0.6× 153 1.4× 160 1.6× 125 1.4× 33 517
Erika Nurmsoo United Kingdom 9 328 1.2× 62 0.4× 95 0.9× 59 0.6× 80 0.9× 15 378
Christina M. Tworek United States 2 133 0.5× 159 1.2× 69 0.6× 120 1.2× 41 0.5× 2 302
Maria Gräfenhain Germany 7 251 0.9× 94 0.7× 126 1.2× 186 1.8× 40 0.4× 11 355
Timothy P. Racine Canada 13 214 0.8× 41 0.3× 99 0.9× 194 1.9× 57 0.6× 31 393
Cara DiYanni United States 8 323 1.2× 106 0.8× 232 2.2× 233 2.3× 58 0.7× 10 551
Josephine Roß United Kingdom 9 179 0.7× 42 0.3× 136 1.3× 91 0.9× 36 0.4× 41 315

Countries citing papers authored by Kimberly E. Vanderbilt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kimberly E. Vanderbilt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kimberly E. Vanderbilt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kimberly E. Vanderbilt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kimberly E. Vanderbilt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kimberly E. Vanderbilt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kimberly E. Vanderbilt. The network helps show where Kimberly E. Vanderbilt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kimberly E. Vanderbilt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kimberly E. Vanderbilt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kimberly E. Vanderbilt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kimberly E. Vanderbilt. Kimberly E. Vanderbilt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Vanderbilt, Kimberly E., et al.. (2022). Preschoolers selectively trust and selectively share with others based on their past accuracy and intentions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 228. 105610–105610. 2 indexed citations
2.
Vanderbilt, Kimberly E., et al.. (2022). The influence of popular media characters on children's object choices. British Journal of Developmental Psychology. 41(1). 1–12. 1 indexed citations
3.
Rizzo, Michael T., Laura Elenbaas, & Kimberly E. Vanderbilt. (2018). Do Children Distinguish Between Resource Inequalities With Individual Versus Structural Origins?. Child Development. 91(2). 439–455. 61 indexed citations
4.
Vanderbilt, Kimberly E., Gail D. Heyman, & David Liu. (2018). Young children show more vigilance against individuals with poor knowledge than those with antisocial motives. Infant and Child Development. 27(3). 10 indexed citations
5.
Vanderbilt, Kimberly E., et al.. (2018). Consider the source: Children link the accuracy of text‐based sources to the accuracy of the author. British Journal of Developmental Psychology. 36(4). 634–651. 7 indexed citations
6.
Vanderbilt, Kimberly E., Gail D. Heyman, & David Liu. (2014). In the absence of conflicting testimony young children trust inaccurate informants. Developmental Science. 17(3). 443–451. 63 indexed citations
7.
Liu, David, Kimberly E. Vanderbilt, & Gail D. Heyman. (2013). Selective trust: Children's use of intention and outcome of past testimony.. Developmental Psychology. 49(3). 439–445. 48 indexed citations
8.
Heyman, Gail D., et al.. (2013). Young Children's Trust in Overtly Misleading Advice. Cognitive Science. 37(4). 646–667. 55 indexed citations
9.
Vanderbilt, Kimberly E., David Liu, & Gail D. Heyman. (2011). The Development of Distrust. Child Development. 82(5). 1372–1380. 121 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026