Anabel Quan‐Haase

11.6k total citations · 5 hit papers
97 papers, 6.3k citations indexed

About

Anabel Quan‐Haase is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Communication and Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Anabel Quan‐Haase has authored 97 papers receiving a total of 6.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 52 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 36 papers in Communication and 18 papers in Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Anabel Quan‐Haase's work include Social Media and Politics (26 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (22 papers) and Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (10 papers). Anabel Quan‐Haase is often cited by papers focused on Social Media and Politics (26 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (22 papers) and Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (10 papers). Anabel Quan‐Haase collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Anabel Quan‐Haase's co-authors include Alyson L. Young, Barry Wellman, Keith N. Hampton, James C. Witte, Luke Sloan, Kim Martin, Wenhong Chen, Kathleen Schreurs, Bradley A. Corbett and Michael Haight and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Technological Forecasting and Social Change and New Media & Society.

In The Last Decade

Anabel Quan‐Haase

90 papers receiving 5.8k citations

Hit Papers

Does the Internet Increas... 2001 2026 2009 2017 2001 2010 2015 2016 2006 250 500 750 1000

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anabel Quan‐Haase Canada 30 3.9k 2.4k 756 684 670 97 6.3k
James E. Katz United States 32 3.2k 0.8× 2.0k 0.9× 255 0.3× 446 0.7× 572 0.9× 133 5.6k
Jessica Vitak United States 33 4.6k 1.2× 2.7k 1.2× 417 0.6× 604 0.9× 507 0.8× 91 6.8k
Ellen Helsper United Kingdom 32 4.2k 1.1× 2.4k 1.0× 867 1.1× 1.0k 1.5× 379 0.6× 66 7.3k
Robert LaRose United States 43 6.0k 1.5× 2.4k 1.0× 631 0.8× 903 1.3× 1.8k 2.7× 110 9.0k
Moira Burke United States 30 3.1k 0.8× 2.0k 0.9× 201 0.3× 407 0.6× 365 0.5× 44 4.9k
Caroline Haythornthwaite United States 37 3.4k 0.9× 3.1k 1.3× 181 0.2× 852 1.2× 588 0.9× 106 7.5k
Catherine E. Connelly Canada 30 1.7k 0.4× 2.6k 1.1× 846 1.1× 443 0.6× 1.0k 1.5× 74 5.8k
Alexander Johannes Aloysius Maria van Deursen Netherlands 38 3.8k 1.0× 2.1k 0.9× 1.1k 1.5× 2.1k 3.1× 932 1.4× 101 10.2k
Matthew S. Eastin United States 38 5.0k 1.3× 1.5k 0.6× 263 0.3× 307 0.4× 1.7k 2.6× 67 7.2k
Jonathon N. Cummings United States 25 2.6k 0.7× 2.4k 1.0× 209 0.3× 402 0.6× 728 1.1× 51 6.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Anabel Quan‐Haase

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anabel Quan‐Haase's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anabel Quan‐Haase with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anabel Quan‐Haase more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anabel Quan‐Haase

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anabel Quan‐Haase. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anabel Quan‐Haase. The network helps show where Anabel Quan‐Haase may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anabel Quan‐Haase

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anabel Quan‐Haase. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anabel Quan‐Haase based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anabel Quan‐Haase. Anabel Quan‐Haase is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Petrovčič, Andraž, et al.. (2024). Digital inequalities among internet users before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A comparison from two cross-sectional surveys in Slovenia. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 209. 123745–123745.
2.
Quan‐Haase, Anabel, et al.. (2024). When Human-AI Interactions Become Parasocial: Agency and Anthropomorphism in Affective Design. 1068–1077. 19 indexed citations
3.
Quan‐Haase, Anabel, et al.. (2024). Health Advice from Instagram Influencers on Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS): Their Strategies to Establish and Manipulate Credibility. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 61(1). 1107–1109.
4.
Quan‐Haase, Anabel & Luke Sloan. (2022). The SAGE Handbook of Social Media Research Methods. 34 indexed citations
5.
Malik, Aqdas, M. Laeeq Khan, & Anabel Quan‐Haase. (2021). Public health agencies outreach through Instagram during the COVID-19 pandemic: Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication perspective. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 61. 102346–102346. 58 indexed citations
6.
Quan‐Haase, Anabel, et al.. (2018). Revisiting the Privacy Paradox. 150–159. 29 indexed citations
7.
Quan‐Haase, Anabel, et al.. (2016). The changing public sphere on Twitter: Network structure, elites and topics of the #righttobeforgotten. New Media & Society. 19(12). 1983–2002. 23 indexed citations
8.
Quan‐Haase, Anabel, Kim Martin, & Lori McCay‐Peet. (2015). Networks of digital humanities scholars: The informational and social uses and gratifications of Twitter. Big Data & Society. 2(1). 46 indexed citations
9.
Quan‐Haase, Anabel. (2015). Technology and Society: Social Networks, Power, and Inequality. 16 indexed citations
10.
Quan‐Haase, Anabel, Kim Martin, & Kathleen Schreurs. (2014). Not All on the Same Page: E-Book Adoption and Technology Exploration by Seniors.. Scholarship@Western (Western University). 19(2). 1. 22 indexed citations
11.
Martin, Kim & Anabel Quan‐Haase. (2014). Designing the next big thing: Randomness versus serendipity in DH tools.. DH. 1 indexed citations
12.
Martin, Kim, et al.. (2014). STAK - Serendipitous Tool for Augmenting Knowledge: Bridging Gaps between Digital and Physical Resources.. DH. 1 indexed citations
13.
Mesch, Gustavo S., Ilan Talmud, & Anabel Quan‐Haase. (2012). Instant messaging social networks. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 29(6). 736–759. 21 indexed citations
14.
Rubin, Victoria L., Jacquelyn Burkell, & Anabel Quan‐Haase. (2011). Facets of serendipity in everyday chance encounter: A grounded theory approach to blog analysis. Scholarship@Western (Western University). 16(3). 53 indexed citations
15.
Young, Alyson L. & Anabel Quan‐Haase. (2009). Information revelation and internet privacy concerns on social network sites. 265–274. 217 indexed citations
16.
Quan‐Haase, Anabel. (2008). Instant Messaging on Campus: Use and Integration in University Students' Everyday Communication. The Information Society. 24(2). 105–115. 61 indexed citations
17.
Quan‐Haase, Anabel. (2007). University Students' Local And Distant Social Ties: Using and integrating modes of communication on campus. Information Communication & Society. 10(5). 671–693. 74 indexed citations
18.
Quan‐Haase, Anabel, et al.. (2007). Im There, But I Might Not Want To Talk To You: Accessibility and Instant Messaging. 1–19. 1 indexed citations
19.
Liscano, Ramiro, et al.. (2003). Context and Intent in Call Processing.. 177–186. 10 indexed citations
20.
Chignell, Mark, Anabel Quan‐Haase, & Jacek Gwizdka. (2003). The Privacy Attitudes Questionnaire (PAQ): Initial Development and Validation. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 47(11). 1326–1330. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026