Khanh Phan

17 papers receiving 433 citations

Peers

Khanh Phan
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Water Science and Technology 178
  • Biotechnology 66
  • Biomaterials 74
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 103
  • Food Science 80
Replace Marı́lia Mateus with:
Marı́lia Mateus Portugal
Sangita Bhattacharjee India
Hangbo Xu China
Machiko Takigami Japan
Özge Dinç Türkiye
M. Kavisri India
Jiří Kučera Czechia
Ana Isabel García López Spain
Roeb García‐Arrazola Mexico
Héctor J. Prado Argentina
Khanh Phan relative to Marı́lia Mateus Portugal Marı́lia Mateus's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Marı́lia Mateus · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Khanh Phan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Khanh Phan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Khanh Phan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Khanh Phan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Khanh Phan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Khanh Phan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Khanh Phan. The network helps show where Khanh Phan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Khanh Phan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Khanh Phan Line = papers co-authored together Khanh Phan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019115
2 201884
3 201759
4 202044
5 202128
6 202126
7 201926
8 202414
9 201414
10 20248
11 20178
12 20246
13 20235
14 20254
15 20242
16 20132
17 20241
18 20240
19 20250
20 20250

About Khanh Phan

Khanh Phan is a scholar working on Water Science and Technology, Pharmaceutical Science, Biomaterials, Biomedical Engineering and Dermatology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 446 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques (6 papers), Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery (5 papers), Bee Products Chemical Analysis (4 papers), Plasma Applications and Diagnostics (4 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Mixing (4 papers), Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition (4 papers), Dermatology and Skin Diseases (3 papers) and Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Water Science and Technology (178 citations), Biotechnology (66 citations), Biomaterials (74 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (103 citations) and Food Science (80 citations). Khanh Phan has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Vietnam and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include Tuyen Truong, Yong Wang, Bhesh Bhandari, Huan Tai Phan, Yuthana Phimolsiripol, Charles S. Brennan, Dheerawan Boonyawan, Joe M. Regenstein, Yousuf Mohammed and Joe M. Regenstein. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Food Science & Technology, ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering, AAPS PharmSciTech, Molecular Pharmaceutics and Food Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact