Kenneth M. Dombek
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering top 5%
- Food Science top 5%
- Spectroscopy top 5%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Elton T. YoungL. O. IngramRobert E. SynovecRachel E. MohlerTrey IdekerJamin C. HoggardBenjamin P. TuNataly Kacherovsky
- Topics
- Fungal and yeast genetics research (21 papers)Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (8 papers)Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (8 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of Biological ChemistryMolecular and Cellular Biology
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandBrazil
In The Last Decade
Kenneth M. Dombek
37 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
- Molecular Biology 1.8k
- Biomedical Engineering 536
- Food Science 315
- Spectroscopy 280
- Plant Science 233
Countries citing papers authored by Kenneth M. Dombek
This map shows the geographic impact of Kenneth M. Dombek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kenneth M. Dombek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kenneth M. Dombek more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kenneth M. Dombek
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kenneth M. Dombek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kenneth M. Dombek. The network helps show where Kenneth M. Dombek may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kenneth M. Dombek
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kenneth M. Dombek. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kenneth M. Dombek based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kenneth M. Dombek. Kenneth M. Dombek is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 41 | |
| 4 | 134 | |
| 5 | 26 | |
| 6 | 57 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 36 | |
| 9 | 54 | |
| 10 | 81 | |
| 11 | 130 | |
| 12 | 56 | |
| 13 | 237 | |
| 14 | 20 | |
| 15 | 49 | |
| 16 | 32 | |
| 17 | 19 | |
| 18 | 40 | |
| 19 | 38 | |
| 20 | 44 |
About Kenneth M. Dombek
Kenneth M. Dombek is a scholar working on Aging, Molecular Biology and Food Science, having authored 37 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fungal and yeast genetics research (21 papers), Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (8 papers) and Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Biology (1.8k citations), Food Science (315 citations) and Spectroscopy (280 citations). Kenneth M. Dombek has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Elton T. Young, L. O. Ingram, Robert E. Synovec, Rachel E. Mohler, Trey Ideker, Jamin C. Hoggard, Benjamin P. Tu, Nataly Kacherovsky, Steven L. McKnight and Jessie Liu. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Molecular and Cellular Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.