Kenneth Fincham
- History top 0.5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Economics and Econometrics
- Religious studies top 5%
- Co-authors
- Peter LakeStephen TaylorNicholas TyackeArthur BurnsP. S. LakeRosemary O’DaySue TaylorH. S. Reinmuth
- Topics
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (16 papers)Scottish History and National Identity (10 papers)Historical Studies of British Isles (9 papers)
- Cited by
- HistoryClassicsReligious studies
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Kenneth Fincham
23 papers receiving 154 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- History 171
- Political Science and International Relations 81
- Sociology and Political Science 45
- Economics and Econometrics 39
- Religious studies 29
Countries citing papers authored by Kenneth Fincham
This map shows the geographic impact of Kenneth Fincham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kenneth Fincham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kenneth Fincham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kenneth Fincham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kenneth Fincham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kenneth Fincham. The network helps show where Kenneth Fincham may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kenneth Fincham
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kenneth Fincham. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kenneth Fincham based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kenneth Fincham. Kenneth Fincham is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | Religious Change and the Laity in England | 1 |
| 4 | 20 | |
| 5 | Religious politics in post-reformation England : essays in honour of Nicholas Tyacke | 4 |
| 6 | The clergy of the Church of England database, 1540-1835 | 1 |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | Visitation articles and injunctions of the early Stuart church | 12 |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 16 | |
| 16 | Peers, Politics and Power: The House of Lords, 1603-1911 | 8 |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 45 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About Kenneth Fincham
Kenneth Fincham is a scholar working on History, Religious studies and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 31 papers that have together received 263 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (16 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (10 papers) and Historical Studies of British Isles (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (171 citations), Classics (27 citations) and Religious studies (29 citations). Kenneth Fincham has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter Lake, Stephen Taylor, Nicholas Tyacke, Arthur Burns, P. S. Lake, Rosemary O’Day, Sue Taylor and H. S. Reinmuth. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The Economic History Review and Sixteenth Century Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.