Kenneth Fincham
- History top 0.5%
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 16
- Scottish History and National Identity 10
- Historical Studies of British Isles 9
- Classics top 10%
- Medieval Literature and History 1
- Religious studies top 5%
- Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies 2
- Museology top 5%
-
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 9
-
- Historical Economic and Social Studies 3
-
- Religious Tourism and Spaces 2
- Co-authors
- Peter LakeStephen TaylorNicholas TyackeArthur BurnsP. S. LakeRosemary O’DaySue TaylorH. S. Reinmuth
- Cited by
- HistoryClassicsReligious studies
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (1 paper)The Economic History Review (1 paper)Sixteenth Century Journal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Kenneth Fincham
23 papers receiving 154 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- History 171
- Classics 27
- Religious studies 29
- Museology 18
- Political Science and International Relations 81
Countries citing papers authored by Kenneth Fincham
This map shows the geographic impact of Kenneth Fincham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kenneth Fincham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kenneth Fincham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kenneth Fincham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kenneth Fincham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kenneth Fincham. The network helps show where Kenneth Fincham may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Kenneth Fincham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 0 | |
| 3 | Religious Change and the Laity in England | 2008 | 1 |
| 4 | 2007 | 20 | |
| 5 | Religious politics in post-reformation England : essays in honour of Nicholas Tyacke | 2006 | 4 |
| 6 | The clergy of the Church of England database, 1540-1835 | 2005 | 1 |
| 7 | 2004 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2003 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2001 | 5 | |
| 11 | 1996 | 6 | |
| 12 | Visitation articles and injunctions of the early Stuart church | 1994 | 12 |
| 13 | 1994 | 0 | |
| 14 | 1991 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1990 | 16 | |
| 16 | Peers, Politics and Power: The House of Lords, 1603-1911 | 1988 | 8 |
| 17 | 1988 | 8 | |
| 18 | 1985 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1985 | 45 | |
| 20 | 1984 | 5 |
About Kenneth Fincham
Kenneth Fincham is a scholar working on History, Religious studies and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 31 papers that have together received 263 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (16 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (10 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (9 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (9 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (3 papers), Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies (2 papers), Religious Tourism and Spaces (2 papers) and Medieval Literature and History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (171 citations), Classics (27 citations) and Religious studies (29 citations). Kenneth Fincham has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter Lake, Stephen Taylor, Nicholas Tyacke, Arthur Burns, P. S. Lake, Rosemary O’Day, Sue Taylor and H. S. Reinmuth. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The Economic History Review and Sixteenth Century Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.