Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Kenneth Button
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Kenneth Button's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kenneth Button with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kenneth Button more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kenneth Button. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kenneth Button. The network helps show where Kenneth Button may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kenneth Button
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kenneth Button.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kenneth Button based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Kenneth Button. Kenneth Button is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Button, Kenneth, Gianmaria Martini, & Davide Scotti. (2015). African Decolonisation and Air Transportation. Journal of transport economics and policy. 49(4). 626–639.6 indexed citations
2.
Button, Kenneth & Werner Rothengatter. (2014). Motor transport, greenhouse gases and economic instruments. International Journal of Environment and Pollution.
Button, Kenneth & Eric J. Pentecost. (1999). Regional Economic Performance within the European Union. University of Maribor digital library (University of Maribor).9 indexed citations
Button, Kenneth, et al.. (1991). VEHICLE OWNERSHIP AND USE FORECASTING IN LOW INCOME COUNTRIES. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique).6 indexed citations
12.
Button, Kenneth. (1990). TRANSPORT DEREGULATION: WHAT ARE THE UNIVERSAL TRUTHS?. Journal of the Transportation Research Forum. 31(1).1 indexed citations
13.
Button, Kenneth. (1988). TRANSPORT DEMANDS OF SCOTLAND'S HIGH-TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRIES. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board.3 indexed citations
Button, Kenneth. (1985). SUBSIDIES, POLITICAL CONTROL, AND COSTS OF U.K. URBAN BUS PROVISION. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board.1 indexed citations
16.
Button, Kenneth & Alan Pearman. (1985). Applied transport economics : a practical case studies approach.
17.
Button, Kenneth. (1985). THE CONTESTABILITY OF THE U.K. INTERURBAN BUS MARKET. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board.3 indexed citations
18.
Button, Kenneth & F Navin. (1983). A PUBLIC TRANSPORT DEMAND FORECASTING MODEL FOR VANCOUVER. Traffic engineering & control. 24(1).
Button, Kenneth. (1982). ROAD PRICING : SOME PRACTICAL AND ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS FOR ITS INTRODUCTION IN BRITAIN. Logistics and transportation review. 18(4).5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.