Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Blockchain for the future of sustainable supply chain management in Industry 4.0
2020558 citationsBehzad Esmaeilian, Joseph Sarkis et al.Resources Conservation and Recyclingprofile →
The future of waste management in smart and sustainable cities: A review and concept paper
2018313 citationsBehzad Esmaeilian, Kemper Lewis et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Kemper Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kemper Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kemper Lewis more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kemper Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kemper Lewis. The network helps show where Kemper Lewis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kemper Lewis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kemper Lewis.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kemper Lewis based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Kemper Lewis. Kemper Lewis is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Esmaeilian, Behzad, Joseph Sarkis, Kemper Lewis, & Sara Behdad. (2020). Blockchain for the future of sustainable supply chain management in Industry 4.0. Resources Conservation and Recycling. 163. 105064–105064.558 indexed citations breakdown →
Moore‐Russo, Deborah, et al.. (2010). Comparing Physical and Cyber-Enhanced Product Dissection: Analysis from Multiple Perspectives. International journal of engineering education. 26(6). 1378–1390.3 indexed citations
Lewis, Kemper. (2007). An Algorithm for Integrated Subsystem Embodiment and System Synthesis. NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).10 indexed citations
Ferguson, Scott, et al.. (2005). A study of convergence and mapping in multiobjective optimization problems. Scopus.7 indexed citations
15.
Lewis, Kemper, et al.. (2003). An approach to robust multiattribute concept selection. Scopus.9 indexed citations
16.
Lewis, Kemper, et al.. (2003). A study of convergence in decentralized design. Scopus.17 indexed citations
17.
Eddy, John & Kemper Lewis. (2002). Visualization of multidimensional design and optimization data using cloud visualization. Scopus.22 indexed citations
18.
Lewis, Kemper, et al.. (2000). An Approach to Facilitate Decision Tradeoffs in Pareto Solution Sets. Scopus.45 indexed citations
19.
Eddy, John, Kurt Hacker, & Kemper Lewis. (2000). Solving computationally expensive optimization problems using hybrid methods in parallel computing environments. Scopus.1 indexed citations
20.
Chen, Wei, Kemper Lewis, & Linda C. Schmidt. (2000). Open workshop on Decision-Based Design: origin, status, promise, and future. Scopus. 3(2). 57–66.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.