Keith R. Brain

76 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Keith R. Brain's Hit Papers

The practical evaluation of phytopharmaceuticals 1975 · 385 citations
3850+17+34Years since publication100200300

Peers

Keith R. Brain
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
  • Analytical Chemistry 913
  • Pharmaceutical Science 530
  • Toxicology 142
  • Dermatology 327
  • Spectroscopy 504
Replace Charles M. Heard with:
Charles M. Heard United Kingdom
Ping Tong China
Constantinos K. Zacharis Greece
María Inés Rocha Miritello Santoro Brazil
Aristotelis Xenakis Greece
H.W. Jun United States
Wolfgang Schwack Germany
Pierina Sueli Bonato Brazil
Rui Oliveira Macêdo Brazil
Érika Rosa Maria Kedor-Hackmann Brazil
Keith R. Brain relative to Charles M. Heard United Kingdom Charles M. Heard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Charles M. Heard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Keith R. Brain

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith R. Brain's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith R. Brain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith R. Brain more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith R. Brain

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith R. Brain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith R. Brain. The network helps show where Keith R. Brain may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Keith R. Brain, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Keith R. Brain Line = papers co-authored together Keith R. Brain links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 78 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The practical evaluation of phytopharmaceuticals
Hit paper breakdown →
1975385
2 2006294
3 2006288
4 2004139
5 2000133
6 2011120
7 1976110
8 199253
9 199846
10 199245
11 197345
12 199644
13 199742
14 199340
15 199740
16 200534
17 199932
18 199731
19 200630
20 200130

About Keith R. Brain

Keith R. Brain is a scholar working on Pharmaceutical Science, Molecular Biology, Dermatology, Analytical Chemistry and Spectroscopy, having authored 78 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery (26 papers), Dermatology and Skin Diseases (12 papers), Contact Dermatitis and Allergies (12 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (11 papers), Analytical chemistry methods development (11 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (8 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (7 papers) and Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Analytical Chemistry (913 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (530 citations), Toxicology (142 citations), Dermatology (327 citations) and Spectroscopy (504 citations). Keith R. Brain has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Christopher J. Allender, Vladimir Hlady, Nicholas W. Turner, David W. Britt, Charles M. Heard, K. Walters, Jonathan Hadgraft, Nathalie Lavignac, A.C. Watkinson and Christopher Richardson. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Pharmaceutics, Phytochemistry, Chirality, Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology and Journal of Chromatography A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact