Resuscitation Plus

816 papers and 3.3k indexed citations

About

The 816 papers published in Resuscitation Plus in the last decades have received a total of 3.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Resuscitation Plus usually cover Emergency Medicine (749 papers), Biomedical Engineering (190 papers) and Surgery (152 papers) specifically the topics of Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (719 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (185 papers) and Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (152 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Resuscitation Plus are Gavin D. Perkins, Katie N. Dainty, Robert Greif, Rachael Fothergill, Andrew Lockey, Adam Smith, Margaret P. Seaton, Janet Bray, Kasper Glerup Lauridsen and Ian R. Drennan.

In The Last Decade

Resuscitation Plus

636 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Countries where authors publish in Resuscitation Plus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Resuscitation Plus. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Resuscitation Plus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Resuscitation Plus more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Resuscitation Plus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Resuscitation Plus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Resuscitation Plus.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026