Ka‐Wai Kwok
- Biomedical Engineering top 2%
- Control and Systems Engineering top 1%
- Surgery top 5%
- Mechanical Engineering top 5%
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 5%
- Topics
- Soft Robotics and Applications (50 papers)Surgical Simulation and Training (20 papers)Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems (20 papers)
- Journals
- CirculationSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of the American College of Cardiology
- Partner nations
- Hong KongUnited KingdomChina
In The Last Decade
Ka‐Wai Kwok
136 papers receiving 3.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
- Biomedical Engineering 1.5k
- Control and Systems Engineering 777
- Surgery 626
- Mechanical Engineering 398
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 317
Countries citing papers authored by Ka‐Wai Kwok
This map shows the geographic impact of Ka‐Wai Kwok's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ka‐Wai Kwok with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ka‐Wai Kwok more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ka‐Wai Kwok
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ka‐Wai Kwok. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ka‐Wai Kwok. The network helps show where Ka‐Wai Kwok may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ka‐Wai Kwok
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ka‐Wai Kwok. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ka‐Wai Kwok based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ka‐Wai Kwok. Ka‐Wai Kwok is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | 37 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 102 | |
| 13 | 33 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 61 | |
| 16 | 57 | |
| 17 | 94 | |
| 18 | 65 | |
| 19 | 72 | |
| 20 | Abstract 18568: Interfacing Fast Multi-phase Cardiac Image Registration with MRI-based Catheter Tracking for MRI-guided Electrophysiological Ablative Procedures | 11 |
About Ka‐Wai Kwok
Ka‐Wai Kwok is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 141 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Soft Robotics and Applications (50 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (20 papers) and Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems (20 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomedical Engineering (1.5k citations), Control and Systems Engineering (777 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (248 citations). Ka‐Wai Kwok has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include James Lam, Guang‐Zhong Yang, Kit-Hang Lee, Xiaomei Wang, Justin Ho, Xiaochen Xie, Ge Fang, Ara Darzi, Kui Wang and K. Y. Sze. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.