Katie Gallagher

1.1k total citations
48 papers, 648 citations indexed

About

Katie Gallagher is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Katie Gallagher has authored 48 papers receiving a total of 648 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 18 papers in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and 14 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Katie Gallagher's work include Infant Development and Preterm Care (21 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (18 papers) and Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (14 papers). Katie Gallagher is often cited by papers focused on Infant Development and Preterm Care (21 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (18 papers) and Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (14 papers). Katie Gallagher collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Katie Gallagher's co-authors include Neil Marlow, Davina Porock, Narendra Aladangady, Chloë Shaw, Eugene J. D’Angelo, Matthias Keller, John D. Martin, Alison Edgley, Elizabeth Stokoe and Matthew K. Nock and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Journal of Advanced Nursing and Patient Education and Counseling.

In The Last Decade

Katie Gallagher

40 papers receiving 631 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Katie Gallagher United Kingdom 16 303 187 187 154 121 48 648
M. Miles United States 15 548 1.8× 285 1.5× 122 0.7× 131 0.9× 80 0.7× 45 887
Leili Borimnejad Iran 16 236 0.8× 159 0.9× 168 0.9× 43 0.3× 158 1.3× 65 663
Emiliana de Omena Bomfim Brazil 13 235 0.8× 136 0.7× 109 0.6× 33 0.2× 87 0.7× 32 583
Young Ran Tak South Korea 9 148 0.5× 163 0.9× 79 0.4× 24 0.2× 99 0.8× 34 427
Isabel María Fernández‐Medina Spain 15 260 0.9× 290 1.6× 188 1.0× 61 0.4× 157 1.3× 65 699
Eleonora Mascheroni Italy 15 516 1.7× 292 1.6× 223 1.2× 130 0.8× 42 0.3× 40 784
Sherylyn H. Briller United States 10 239 0.8× 230 1.2× 301 1.6× 12 0.1× 80 0.7× 30 560
Sameera S. Nayak United States 6 107 0.4× 200 1.1× 105 0.6× 27 0.2× 132 1.1× 14 473
Kerstin Nyström Sweden 5 161 0.5× 148 0.8× 188 1.0× 42 0.3× 69 0.6× 5 436
E. Brugman Indonesia 7 170 0.6× 265 1.4× 103 0.6× 62 0.4× 90 0.7× 23 578

Countries citing papers authored by Katie Gallagher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Katie Gallagher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Katie Gallagher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Katie Gallagher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Katie Gallagher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Katie Gallagher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Katie Gallagher. The network helps show where Katie Gallagher may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Katie Gallagher

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Katie Gallagher. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Katie Gallagher based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Katie Gallagher. Katie Gallagher is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
3.
Gallagher, Katie, et al.. (2024). Repatriation of babies between neonatal units: A parent survey. Journal of Neonatal Nursing. 30(5). 456–460.
4.
Latour, Jos M., et al.. (2024). Job satisfaction and intent to stay in neonatal nursing in England and Wales: a study protocol. BMC Health Services Research. 24(1). 913–913.
5.
Ho, John, et al.. (2023). Neonatal staff perceptions and attitudes towards Family Integrated Care and Fathers: A Multi-site Survey. Journal of Neonatal Nursing. 30(4). 349–352. 3 indexed citations
6.
Battersby, Cheryl, James P. Boardman, Elaine M. Boyle, et al.. (2023). National priority setting partnership using a Delphi consensus process to develop neonatal research questions suitable for practice-changing randomised trials in the UK. Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal. 108(6). 569–574. 9 indexed citations
7.
Gallagher, Katie, et al.. (2023). The NeoPACE study: study protocol for the development of a core outcome set for neonatal palliative care. BMC Palliative Care. 22(1). 203–203. 2 indexed citations
8.
Gallagher, Katie, Neeltje Crombag, Jan Deprest, et al.. (2023). Global Policy and Practice for Intrauterine Fetal Resuscitation During Fetal Surgery for Open Spina Bifida Repair. JAMA Network Open. 6(4). e239855–e239855. 1 indexed citations
9.
Battersby, Cheryl, James P. Boardman, Elaine M. Boyle, et al.. (2022). National priority setting partnership using a Delphi consensus process to develop neonatal research questions suitable for practice-changing randomised trials in the United Kingdom. BMJ Open. 12(9). e061330–e061330. 2 indexed citations
10.
Crombag, Neeltje, Adalina Sacco, Philippe De Vloo, et al.. (2021). ‘We did everything we could’– a qualitative study exploring the acceptability of maternal‐fetal surgery for spina bifida to parents. Prenatal Diagnosis. 41(8). 910–921. 16 indexed citations
11.
Gallagher, Katie, Julia Petty, Joanne Cooper, & Neil Marlow. (2021). Neonatal nursing led research activity in the UK: a survey of current practice. BMC Nursing. 20(1). 201–201. 2 indexed citations
12.
Whitehead, Clare, Greg Ryan, Jan Deprest, et al.. (2020). Development of a Core outcome set for fetal Myelomeningocele (COSMiC): study protocol. Trials. 21(1). 732–732. 7 indexed citations
13.
Shaw, Chloë, et al.. (2020). Initiating end-of-life decisions with parents of infants receiving neonatal intensive care. Patient Education and Counseling. 103(7). 1351–1357. 18 indexed citations
14.
Gallagher, Katie, et al.. (2017). Nursing & parental perceptions of neonatal care in Central Vietnam: a longitudinal qualitative study. BMC Pediatrics. 17(1). 161–161. 12 indexed citations
15.
D’Angelo, Eugene J. & Katie Gallagher. (2016). Capturing Psychologists’ Work in Academic Health Settings: The Role of the Educational Value Unit (EVU). Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings. 23(1). 21–32. 2 indexed citations
16.
Christine, B., Tara M. Augenstein, Katherine H. Frost, et al.. (2015). Using Implicit and Explicit Measures to Predict Nonsuicidal Self-Injury Among Adolescent Inpatients. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 55(1). 62–68. 41 indexed citations
17.
Gallagher, Katie, Neil Marlow, Alison Edgley, & Davina Porock. (2011). The attitudes of neonatal nurses towards extremely preterm infants. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 68(8). 1768–1779. 22 indexed citations
18.
Gallagher, Katie, Davina Porock, & Alison Edgley. (2010). The concept of ‘nursing’ in the abortion services. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 66(4). 849–857. 30 indexed citations
19.
Gallagher, Katie & Davina Porock. (2010). The Use of Interviews in Q Methodology. Nursing Research. 59(4). 295–300. 67 indexed citations
20.
Balas, Benjamin, et al.. (2005). The Effects of Scene Category and Content on Boundary Extension. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 27(27). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by M. Miles Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Leili Borimnejad Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Emiliana de Omena Bomfim Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Young Ran Tak Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Isabel María Fernández‐Medina Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Eleonora Mascheroni Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sherylyn H. Briller Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sameera S. Nayak Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kerstin Nyström Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by E. Brugman
Rankless by CCL
2026