Chloë Shaw

1.4k citations
37 papers · 963 · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Chloë Shaw

37 papers receiving 925 citations

Peers

Chloë Shaw
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Aging 129
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 376
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 66
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 67
  • Language and Linguistics 99
Replace Gareth Richards with:
Gareth Richards United Kingdom
David W. Walker United States
Andrew A. Walker Australia
Elizabeth Silva United States
J. Kent Davis United States
Bret Beheim United States
Els Tobback Belgium
Paul Williams United States
Ina Anreiter Canada
Jessica L. Malisch United States
Chloë Shaw relative to Gareth Richards United Kingdom Gareth Richards's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.3×
Gareth Richards · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chloë Shaw

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chloë Shaw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chloë Shaw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chloë Shaw more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chloë Shaw

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chloë Shaw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chloë Shaw. The network helps show where Chloë Shaw may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chloë Shaw, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chloë Shaw Line = papers co-authored together Chloë Shaw links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991155
2 201353
3 201648
4 199347
5 199046
6 201544
7 199043
8 199540
9 198938
10 199738
11 201734
12 196031
13 199931
14 199028
15 201828
16 199227
17 199125
18 201623
19 202022
20 199621

About Chloë Shaw

Chloë Shaw is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Molecular Biology, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Social Psychology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 963 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (9 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (7 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (6 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (5 papers), Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (4 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (4 papers), Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (4 papers) and Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (129 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (376 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (66 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (67 citations) and Language and Linguistics (99 citations). Chloë Shaw has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include D.W. Halton, C.F. Johnston, Aaron G. Maule, I. Fairweather, Alexa Hepburn, L. Thim, Katie Gallagher, Neil Marlow, Narendra Aladangady and K. D. Buchanan. Their work appears in journals such as Parasitology, Regulatory Peptides, International Journal for Parasitology, Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal and Patient Education and Counseling.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact